SMH vs. CHPY

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY).

SMH and CHPY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. CHPY is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on Apr 2, 2025.

Performance

SMH vs. CHPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SMH vs. CHPY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	8.84%	84.72%
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	12.50%	62.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 8.84% return, which is significantly lower than CHPY's 12.50% return.

SMH

• 1D: 2.24%
• 1M: -3.55%
• YTD: 8.84%
• 6M: 17.83%
• 1Y: 85.04%
• 3Y*: 44.53%
• 5Y*: 26.15%
• 10Y*: 31.58%

CHPY

• 1D: 1.79%
• 1M: -1.93%
• YTD: 12.50%
• 6M: 22.79%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMH vs. CHPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CHPY's 0.99% expense ratio.

CHPY

YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF

SMH

VanEck Semiconductor ETF

Return for Risk

SMH vs. CHPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 95
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMH vs. CHPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMH	CHPY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.39	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	19.22	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMH	CHPY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.32	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.98	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	2.59	-2.31

Correlation

The correlation between SMH and CHPY is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

SMH vs. CHPY - Dividend Comparison

SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than CHPY's 39.01% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.28%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	39.01%	28.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

SMH vs. CHPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than CHPY's maximum drawdown of -12.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and CHPY.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMH	CHPY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.96%	-12.17%	-72.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.02%	-4.98%	-3.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.35%	-2.16%	-39.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.47%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SMH	CHPY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.74%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.02%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.88%	32.72%	+4.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.68%	32.72%	+1.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.29%	32.72%	-0.43%