SMFG vs. LI.PA
SMFG (Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.) and LI.PA (Klepierre SA) are both stocks. SMFG operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while LI.PA operates in REIT - Retail (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, SMFG returned 19.40%/yr vs 4.75%/yr for LI.PA. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SMFG vs. LI.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SMFG is traded in USD, while LI.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LI.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMFG achieves a 22.66% return, which is significantly higher than LI.PA's 9.92% return. Over the past 10 years, SMFG has outperformed LI.PA with an annualized return of 19.40%, while LI.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 4.75% annualized return.
SMFG
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 7.92%
- YTD
- 22.66%
- 6M
- 21.15%
- 1Y
- 58.82%
- 3Y*
- 44.31%
- 5Y*
- 31.63%
- 10Y*
- 19.40%
LI.PA
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 9.92%
- 6M
- 9.67%
- 1Y
- 15.86%
- 3Y*
- 27.74%
- 5Y*
- 17.75%
- 10Y*
- 4.75%
SMFG vs. LI.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMFG Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 22.66% | 38.01% | 54.90% | 25.63% | 21.70% | 10.05% | -11.00% | 19.47% | -22.21% | 17.95% |
LI.PA Klepierre SA | 9.92% | 45.94% | 13.75% | 28.28% | 4.98% | 5.66% | -37.17% | 27.43% | -25.72% | 17.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMFG and LI.PA is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2007 | 0.24 |
The correlation between SMFG and LI.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMFG vs. LI.PA — Risk / Return Rank
SMFG
LI.PA
SMFG vs. LI.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG) and Klepierre SA (LI.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMFG | LI.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.16 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 1.23 | +1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.30 | 2.80 | +5.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMFG vs. LI.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMFG drawdown since its inception was -77.26%, roughly equal to the maximum LI.PA drawdown of -78.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMFG and LI.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMFG | LI.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.26% | -78.58% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.12% | -12.69% | -7.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.67% | -15.00% | -10.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.88% | -39.76% | +11.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.66% | -70.10% | +22.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.02% | -0.22% | -5.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.94% | -23.12% | -24.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.10% | 5.63% | +1.47% |
Volatility
SMFG vs. LI.PA - Volatility Comparison
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG) has a higher volatility of 8.67% compared to Klepierre SA (LI.PA) at 5.13%. This indicates that SMFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LI.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMFG | LI.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.67% | 5.13% | +3.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.83% | 14.37% | +7.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.63% | 17.81% | +10.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.86% | 28.34% | +0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.81% | 36.83% | -10.02% |
Dividends
SMFG vs. LI.PA - Dividend Comparison
SMFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than LI.PA's 5.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LI.PA Klepierre SA | 5.05% | 5.48% | 6.47% | 7.09% | 7.90% | 0.00% | 5.98% | 3.10% | 7.27% | 4.96% | 4.55% | 3.90% |
SMFG Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 1.26% | 2.84% | 2.82% | 3.67% | 2.12% | 0.00% | 5.97% | 4.61% | 4.80% | 3.17% | 3.63% | 3.32% |
Financials
SMFG vs. LI.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. and Klepierre SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SMFG and LI.PA have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SMFG and LI.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer