LI.PA vs. CARM.PA
Compare and contrast key facts about Klepierre SA (LI.PA) and Carmila SA (CARM.PA).
Performance
LI.PA vs. CARM.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LI.PA vs. CARM.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LI.PA Klepierre SA | 2.79% | 28.66% | 17.45% | 24.13% | 11.69% | 18.41% | -42.43% | 34.58% | -22.07% | 3.30% |
CARM.PA Carmila SA | -0.00% | 13.60% | 10.70% | 27.03% | 3.23% | 26.40% | -35.71% | 27.23% | -28.24% | 9.84% |
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, LI.PA has outperformed CARM.PA with an annualized return of 4.03%, while CARM.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 2.18% annualized return.
LI.PA
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 2.79%
- 6M
- 5.23%
- 1Y
- 14.82%
- 3Y*
- 23.85%
- 5Y*
- 18.23%
- 10Y*
- 4.03%
CARM.PA
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -3.52%
- YTD
- -0.00%
- 6M
- -1.62%
- 1Y
- 2.01%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 13.22%
- 10Y*
- 2.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LI.PA vs. CARM.PA — Risk / Return Rank
LI.PA
CARM.PA
LI.PA vs. CARM.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Klepierre SA (LI.PA) and Carmila SA (CARM.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LI.PA | CARM.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 0.10 | +0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.24 | 0.26 | +0.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.04 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 0.59 | +1.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.44 | 1.06 | +3.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LI.PA | CARM.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 0.10 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.47 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | 0.06 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.09 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between LI.PA and CARM.PA is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LI.PA vs. CARM.PA - Dividend Comparison
LI.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.56%, less than CARM.PA's 7.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LI.PA Klepierre SA | 5.56% | 5.48% | 3.60% | 6.93% | 7.90% | 4.80% | 7.35% | 6.20% | 7.27% | 4.96% | 4.55% | 3.90% |
CARM.PA Carmila SA | 7.35% | 7.35% | 7.49% | 7.51% | 7.50% | 7.22% | 8.49% | 2.45% | 4.64% | 10.98% | 6.57% | 5.27% |
Drawdowns
LI.PA vs. CARM.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LI.PA drawdown since its inception was -79.99%, smaller than the maximum CARM.PA drawdown of -92.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LI.PA and CARM.PA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LI.PA | CARM.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.99% | -92.77% | +12.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.08% | -15.54% | +4.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.90% | -25.90% | -3.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.06% | -81.07% | +11.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.63% | -73.28% | +70.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.49% | -78.58% | +60.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.18% | 8.67% | -3.49% |
Volatility
LI.PA vs. CARM.PA - Volatility Comparison
Klepierre SA (LI.PA) has a higher volatility of 8.28% compared to Carmila SA (CARM.PA) at 6.56%. This indicates that LI.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CARM.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LI.PA | CARM.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.28% | 6.56% | +1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.80% | 13.39% | -0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.54% | 20.65% | -3.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.36% | 27.41% | -1.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.70% | 34.61% | +1.09% |
Financials
LI.PA vs. CARM.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Klepierre SA and Carmila SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities