SMFG vs. ARES
SMFG (Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.) and ARES (Ares Management Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — SMFG in Banks - Diversified, ARES in Asset Management. Over the past 10 years, SMFG returned 19.72%/yr vs 31.19%/yr for ARES. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SMFG vs. ARES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMFG achieves a 26.23% return, which is significantly higher than ARES's -15.40% return. Over the past 10 years, SMFG has underperformed ARES with an annualized return of 19.72%, while ARES has yielded a comparatively higher 31.19% annualized return.
SMFG
- 1D
- 2.43%
- 1M
- 9.27%
- YTD
- 26.23%
- 6M
- 28.02%
- 1Y
- 63.87%
- 3Y*
- 47.38%
- 5Y*
- 31.41%
- 10Y*
- 19.72%
ARES
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- 9.51%
- YTD
- -15.40%
- 6M
- -20.42%
- 1Y
- -17.98%
- 3Y*
- 16.02%
- 5Y*
- 21.68%
- 10Y*
- 31.19%
SMFG vs. ARES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMFG Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 26.23% | 38.01% | 54.90% | 25.63% | 21.70% | 10.05% | -11.00% | 19.47% | -22.21% | 17.95% |
ARES Ares Management Corporation | -15.40% | -5.72% | 52.68% | 79.52% | -12.75% | 77.75% | 37.37% | 110.13% | -5.54% | 10.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMFG and ARES is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2014 | 0.26 |
Fundamentals
SMFG:
¥563.43
ARES:
$2.83
SMFG:
6.94
ARES:
47.65
SMFG:
0.55
ARES:
1.90
SMFG:
1.13
ARES:
4.71
SMFG:
¥15.42T
ARES:
$6.31B
SMFG:
¥8.35T
ARES:
$4.46B
SMFG:
¥3.54T
ARES:
$2.42B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMFG vs. ARES — Risk / Return Rank
SMFG
ARES
SMFG vs. ARES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMFG | ARES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 0.95 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | -0.37 | +3.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.07 | -0.72 | +9.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMFG vs. ARES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMFG drawdown since its inception was -77.26%, which is greater than ARES's maximum drawdown of -49.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMFG and ARES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMFG | ARES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.26% | -49.73% | -27.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.12% | -49.05% | +28.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.67% | -49.73% | +24.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.88% | -49.73% | +21.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.66% | -49.73% | +2.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -28.77% | +28.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.03% | -11.33% | -36.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.06% | 25.00% | -17.94% |
Volatility
SMFG vs. ARES - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG) is 7.99%, while Ares Management Corporation (ARES) has a volatility of 11.97%. This indicates that SMFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMFG | ARES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.99% | 11.97% | -3.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.54% | 35.10% | -13.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.33% | 41.35% | -13.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.82% | 37.37% | -8.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.91% | 36.71% | -9.80% |
Dividends
SMFG vs. ARES - Dividend Comparison
SMFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than ARES's 4.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARES Ares Management Corporation | 4.12% | 3.29% | 2.10% | 2.59% | 3.57% | 2.31% | 3.40% | 3.59% | 7.50% | 5.65% | 4.32% | 6.81% |
SMFG Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 1.23% | 2.84% | 2.82% | 3.67% | 2.12% | 0.00% | 5.97% | 4.61% | 4.80% | 3.17% | 3.63% | 3.32% |
Financials
SMFG vs. ARES - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. and Ares Management Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SMFG vs. ARES - Profitability Comparison
SMFG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.37T and revenue of 2.51T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.6%.
ARES - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.47B and revenue of 1.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.1%.
SMFG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 364.07B and revenue of 2.51T, resulting in an operating margin of 14.5%.
ARES - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported an operating income of 364.95M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.8%.
SMFG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 191.66B and revenue of 2.51T, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.
ARES - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported a net income of 142.59M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in a net margin of 9.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SMFG and ARES have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARES has higher volatility (11.97%) compared to SMFG (7.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMFG dropped -77.26% vs ARES's -49.73%.
SMFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMFG and ARES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer