PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMDX vs. ISCMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMDX vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (SMDX) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMDX achieves a 15.69% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 22.87% return.


SMDX

1D
-0.67%
1M
2.79%
YTD
15.69%
6M
13.56%
1Y
29.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ISCMF

1D
0.00%
1M
-4.99%
YTD
22.87%
6M
22.87%
1Y
31.30%
3Y*
16.78%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMDX vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SMDX and ISCMF is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2025

-0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMDX vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMDX
SMDX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCMF
ISCMF Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ISCMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCMF Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCMF Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMDX vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (SMDX) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMDXISCMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

2.31

-1.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

5.53

-2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.75

11.85

-0.10

SMDX vs. ISCMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the ISCMF Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMDX and ISCMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMDX vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMDX drawdown since its inception was -14.52%, smaller than the maximum ISCMF drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMDX and ISCMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMDXISCMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.52%

-25.42%

+10.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.66%

-5.69%

-2.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-5.26%

+4.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.32%

-13.35%

+11.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

2.65%

-0.16%

Volatility

SMDX vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Intech S&P Small-Mid Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (SMDX) is 4.23%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that SMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMDXISCMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

5.11%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.79%

15.45%

-3.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.67%

17.84%

-1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.99%

14.29%

+6.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.99%

14.29%

+6.70%

SMDX vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMDX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMDX vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison

SMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


SMDX and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISCMF has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to SMDX (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMDX dropped -14.52% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.

On 1-year performance, ISCMF leads with 31.30% vs 29.15% for SMDX. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, SMDX has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ISCMF has performed better with a 31.30% return vs 29.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMDX.

SMDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.

SMDX is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while ISCMF is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Intech and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMDX and 0.19% for ISCMF.

ISCMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMDX and ISCMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer