SMDV vs. SCDS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SMDV (ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF) and SCDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. SMDV is passively managed, while SCDS is actively managed. Over the past year, SMDV returned 13.74% vs 42.67% for SCDS. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.

Performance

SMDV vs. SCDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMDV achieves a 8.80% return, which is significantly lower than SCDS's 22.66% return.

SMDV

• 1D: -1.58%
• 1M: -0.39%
• YTD: 8.80%
• 6M: 7.57%
• 1Y: 13.74%
• 3Y*: 9.13%
• 5Y*: 3.88%
• 10Y*: 7.08%

SCDS

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 6.01%
• YTD: 22.66%
• 6M: 21.54%
• 1Y: 42.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMDV vs. SCDS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SMDV ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF	8.80%	0.26%	3.69%
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF	22.66%	11.27%	7.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SMDV and SCDS is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2024	0.80

The correlation between SMDV and SCDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMDV vs. SCDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SMDV	SCDS
Financial Services	31.9%	14.7%
Industrials	22.2%	14.6%
Utilities	15.8%	2.4%
Basic Materials	7.8%	3.2%
Real Estate	7.4%	4.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	2.2%
Consumer Cyclical	4.1%	10.7%
Technology	3.2%	20.8%
Healthcare	1.8%	11.0%
Communication Services	1.0%	1.6%
Energy	-	3.9%

Return for Risk

SMDV vs. SCDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMDV

SMDV Risk / Return Rank: 26
SMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
SMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
SMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 24
SMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
SMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 29

SCDS

SCDS Risk / Return Rank: 77
SCDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
SCDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
SCDS Omega Ratio Rank: 67
SCDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
SCDS Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMDV vs. SCDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMDV	SCDS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	2.36	-1.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.42	3.33	-1.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.40	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	4.84	-3.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.25	16.84	-12.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMDV vs. SCDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMDV Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the SCDS Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMDV and SCDS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMDV	SCDS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87	2.36	-1.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	1.11	-0.73

Drawdowns

SMDV vs. SCDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMDV drawdown since its inception was -34.12%, which is greater than SCDS's maximum drawdown of -26.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMDV and SCDS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMDV	SCDS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.12%	-26.71%	-7.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.79%	-8.85%	-0.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.76%	-0.76%	-2.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.93%	-5.28%	-0.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.25%	2.54%	+0.71%

Volatility

SMDV vs. SCDS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) is 4.41%, while JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that SMDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMDV	SCDS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.41%	5.58%	-1.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.55%	12.93%	-2.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.85%	18.20%	-2.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.69%	21.20%	-2.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.73%	21.20%	-0.47%

SMDV vs. SCDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SMDV and SCDS have an expense ratio of 0.40%.

Dividends

SMDV vs. SCDS - Dividend Comparison

SMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, more than SCDS's 0.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF	0.92%	1.15%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMDV ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF	2.42%	2.67%	2.68%	2.69%	2.51%	2.02%	2.13%	2.03%	1.97%	1.84%	1.35%	1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMDV and SCDS in my portfolio?

SMDV and SCDS have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMDV or SCDS?

SCDS has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to SMDV (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMDV dropped -34.12% vs SCDS's -26.71%.

Which ETF is better, SMDV or SCDS?

On 1-year performance, SCDS leads with 42.67% vs 13.74% for SMDV. Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. On volatility, SMDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMDV or SCDS?

Over the 1-year period, SCDS has performed better with a 42.67% return vs 13.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMDV or SCDS?

SMDV and SCDS have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMDV or SCDS?

SMDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 0.92% for SCDS.

What is the main difference between SMDV and SCDS?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and JPMorgan.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.