SMDV vs. DBO
SMDV (ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SMDV is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Dividend Growth Index, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMDV returned 7.53%/yr vs 12.59%/yr for DBO. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SMDV charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
SMDV vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMDV achieves a 18.11% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 76.48% return. Over the past 10 years, SMDV has underperformed DBO with an annualized return of 7.53%, while DBO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.
SMDV
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 10.74%
- YTD
- 18.11%
- 1Y
- 23.79%
- 3Y*
- 10.63%
- 5Y*
- 6.99%
- 10Y*
- 7.53%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.24%
DBO
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 24.59%
- 6M
- 53.46%
- YTD
- 76.48%
- 1Y
- 60.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.46%
- 10Y*
- 12.59%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.52%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.01M | $10.23M | $13.95M | |
| $4.61M | $5.90M | $3.47M |
SMDV vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMDV ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF | 18.11% | 0.26% | 7.03% | 8.99% | -5.90% | 18.98% | -4.74% | 17.23% | -0.58% | 4.63% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 76.48% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | 60.74% | -20.99% | 28.05% | -15.22% | 4.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMDV and DBO is -0.33, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2015 | 0.13 |
The correlation between SMDV and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.33 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMDV vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
SMDV
DBO
SMDV vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMDV | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.25 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 2.01 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.27 | 6.09 | +1.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMDV vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMDV drawdown since its inception was -34.12%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMDV and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMDV | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.12% | -90.18% | +56.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.79% | -27.73% | +17.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.23% | -28.20% | +6.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.23% | -37.68% | +16.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.12% | -61.69% | +27.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.36% | -53.56% | +51.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.87% | -62.20% | +56.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 9.96% | -6.87% |
Volatility
SMDV vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) is 4.40%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 17.75%. This indicates that SMDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMDV | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.40% | 17.75% | -13.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.24% | 33.77% | -23.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.45% | 38.53% | -23.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.56% | 33.35% | -14.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.75% | 32.20% | -11.45% |
SMDV vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMDV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMDV vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
SMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, more than DBO's 1.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.99% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMDV ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF | 2.29% | 2.67% | 2.68% | 2.69% | 2.51% | 2.02% | 2.13% | 2.03% | 1.97% | 1.84% | 1.35% | 1.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMDV and DBO have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (17.75%) compared to SMDV (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMDV dropped -34.12% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 10-year performance, DBO leads with 12.59% vs 7.53% for SMDV. On fees, SMDV is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, SMDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBO has performed better with a 12.59% return vs 7.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMDV is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
SMDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.29%, compared with 1.99% for DBO.
SMDV is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. SMDV tracks Russell 2000 Dividend Growth Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SMDV and 0.78% for DBO.
SMDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMDV and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer