SMDD vs. IJH
SMDD (ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400) and IJH (iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMDD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index (-300%), while IJH is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMDD returned -39.71%/yr vs 11.08%/yr for IJH. At a correlation of -0.98, they often move in opposite directions. SMDD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for IJH.
Performance
SMDD vs. IJH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMDD achieves a -36.11% return, which is significantly lower than IJH's 15.69% return. Over the past 10 years, SMDD has underperformed IJH with an annualized return of -39.71%, while IJH has yielded a comparatively higher 11.08% annualized return.
SMDD
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- 6M
- -23.09%
- YTD
- -36.11%
- 1Y
- -45.70%
- 3Y*
- -34.48%
- 5Y*
- -31.60%
- 10Y*
- -39.71%
IJH
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 8.71%
- YTD
- 15.69%
- 1Y
- 22.57%
- 3Y*
- 13.82%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 11.08%
SMDD vs. IJH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMDD ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400 | -36.11% | -27.46% | -31.02% | -38.37% | 7.69% | -58.01% | -74.71% | -53.34% | 33.50% | -39.87% |
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 15.69% | 7.42% | 13.92% | 16.40% | -13.11% | 24.72% | 13.60% | 26.10% | -11.19% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMDD and IJH is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | -0.98 |
The correlation between SMDD and IJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMDD vs. IJH — Risk / Return Rank
SMDD
IJH
SMDD vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400 (SMDD) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMDD | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.26 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | 2.57 | -3.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.59 | 9.30 | -10.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMDD vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMDD drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than IJH's maximum drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMDD and IJH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMDD | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -55.07% | -44.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.01% | -8.83% | -41.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.62% | -24.10% | -58.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.24% | -24.10% | -64.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.45% | -42.18% | -57.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -1.45% | -98.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.99% | -7.54% | -85.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.79% | 2.43% | +26.36% |
Volatility
SMDD vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400 (SMDD) has a higher volatility of 10.40% compared to iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) at 3.57%. This indicates that SMDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMDD | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.40% | 3.57% | +6.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.28% | 11.69% | +23.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.19% | 15.76% | +31.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.75% | 19.72% | +39.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.21% | 21.12% | +42.09% |
SMDD vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IJH's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMDD vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison
SMDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, more than IJH's 1.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.17% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% |
SMDD ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400 | 5.85% | 4.96% | 4.09% | 3.86% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 1.51% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMDD and IJH have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMDD has higher volatility (10.40%) compared to IJH (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMDD dropped -99.99% vs IJH's -55.07%.
On 10-year performance, IJH leads with 11.08% vs -39.71% for SMDD. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IJH has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IJH has performed better with a 11.08% return vs -39.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SMDD.
SMDD has the higher dividend yield at 5.85%, compared with 1.17% for IJH.
SMDD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IJH is Mid Cap Blend Equities. SMDD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (-300%), while IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SMDD and 0.05% for IJH.
IJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMDD and IJH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer