SMCZ vs. SARK
SMCZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF) and SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SMCZ returned -89.94% vs -33.81% for SARK. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMCZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SARK.
Performance
SMCZ vs. SARK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMCZ achieves a -90.14% return, which is significantly lower than SARK's -6.78% return.
SMCZ
- 1D
- 10.93%
- 1M
- -77.87%
- YTD
- -90.14%
- 6M
- -87.78%
- 1Y
- -89.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SARK
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- -6.78%
- 6M
- -2.33%
- 1Y
- -33.81%
- 3Y*
- -30.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMCZ vs. SARK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMCZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF | -90.14% | -61.04% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -6.78% | -39.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMCZ and SARK is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025 | 0.56 |
The correlation between SMCZ and SARK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMCZ vs. SARK — Risk / Return Rank
SMCZ
SARK
SMCZ vs. SARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF (SMCZ) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMCZ | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | -0.95 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | -1.30 | +0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 0.86 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | -0.83 | -0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.00 | -1.11 | -0.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMCZ | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.57 | -0.95 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.58 | -0.24 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
SMCZ vs. SARK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMCZ drawdown since its inception was -97.40%, which is greater than SARK's maximum drawdown of -81.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCZ and SARK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMCZ | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.40% | -81.07% | -16.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -91.74% | -40.75% | -50.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -74.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.12% | -79.42% | -17.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.71% | -46.46% | -29.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.99% | 30.47% | +14.52% |
Volatility
SMCZ vs. SARK - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF (SMCZ) has a higher volatility of 80.07% compared to Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) at 9.13%. This indicates that SMCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SARK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMCZ | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 80.07% | 9.13% | +70.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 131.65% | 25.05% | +106.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 156.87% | 35.91% | +120.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 163.39% | 56.24% | +107.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 163.39% | 56.24% | +107.15% |
SMCZ vs. SARK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMCZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SARK's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMCZ vs. SARK - Dividend Comparison
SMCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.59%, more than SARK's 3.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 3.02% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% |
SMCZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF | 20.59% | 2.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMCZ and SARK have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMCZ has higher volatility (80.07%) compared to SARK (9.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCZ dropped -97.40% vs SARK's -81.07%.
On 1-year performance, SARK leads with -33.81% vs -89.94% for SMCZ. On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SARK has been the lower-risk option at 9.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SARK has performed better with a -33.81% return vs -89.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMCZ.
SMCZ has the higher dividend yield at 20.59%, compared with 3.02% for SARK.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and AXS. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for SMCZ and 0.75% for SARK.
SMCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.57 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMCZ and SARK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer