SMCZ vs. QQQY
SMCZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF) and QQQY (Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMCZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while QQQY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SMCZ returned -73.11% vs 22.96% for QQQY. Their -0.59 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SMCZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for QQQY.
Performance
SMCZ vs. QQQY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMCZ achieves a -87.76% return, which is significantly lower than QQQY's 13.77% return.
SMCZ
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -31.27%
- 6M
- -85.93%
- YTD
- -87.76%
- 1Y
- -73.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -89.95%
QQQY
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- 6M
- 12.12%
- YTD
- 13.77%
- 1Y
- 22.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.87M | $2.12M | $2.91M | |
| $23.07M | $12.69M | $14.60M |
SMCZ vs. QQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMCZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF | -87.76% | -62.31% |
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF | 13.77% | 22.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMCZ and QQQY is -0.59, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2025 | -0.59 |
The correlation between SMCZ and QQQY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.59 to -0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMCZ vs. QQQY — Risk / Return Rank
SMCZ
QQQY
SMCZ vs. QQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF (SMCZ) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMCZ | QQQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.25 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 2.07 | -2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | 7.27 | -8.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMCZ vs. QQQY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMCZ drawdown since its inception was -97.40%, which is greater than QQQY's maximum drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCZ and QQQY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMCZ | QQQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.40% | -19.05% | -78.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -91.49% | -11.14% | -80.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.42% | -4.80% | -91.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -77.91% | -2.97% | -74.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.58% | 3.16% | +46.42% |
Volatility
SMCZ vs. QQQY - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF (SMCZ) has a higher volatility of 65.84% compared to Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) at 6.57%. This indicates that SMCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMCZ | QQQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 65.84% | 6.57% | +59.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 160.74% | 15.25% | +145.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 178.69% | 17.40% | +161.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 175.68% | 15.76% | +159.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 175.68% | 15.76% | +159.92% |
SMCZ vs. QQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMCZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMCZ vs. QQQY - Dividend Comparison
SMCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.59%, less than QQQY's 36.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF | 36.92% | 45.34% | 83.34% | 20.64% |
SMCZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF | 16.59% | 2.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMCZ and QQQY have a correlation of -0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMCZ has higher volatility (65.84%) compared to QQQY (6.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCZ dropped -97.40% vs QQQY's -19.05%.
On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 22.96% vs -73.11% for SMCZ. On fees, QQQY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, QQQY has been the lower-risk option at 6.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 22.96% return vs -73.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMCZ.
QQQY has the higher dividend yield at 36.92%, compared with 16.59% for SMCZ.
SMCZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while QQQY is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for SMCZ and 0.99% for QQQY.
QQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMCZ and QQQY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer