SMCZ vs. CARD
SMCZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF) and CARD (Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both Inverse Equities funds. SMCZ is actively managed, while CARD is passively managed. Over the past year, SMCZ returned -89.94% vs -35.78% for CARD. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMCZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CARD.
Performance
SMCZ vs. CARD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMCZ achieves a -90.14% return, which is significantly lower than CARD's -2.60% return.
SMCZ
- 1D
- 10.93%
- 1M
- -77.87%
- YTD
- -90.14%
- 6M
- -87.78%
- 1Y
- -89.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CARD
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -13.67%
- YTD
- -2.60%
- 6M
- -2.07%
- 1Y
- -35.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMCZ vs. CARD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMCZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF | -90.14% | -61.04% |
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -2.60% | -62.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMCZ and CARD is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMCZ vs. CARD — Risk / Return Rank
SMCZ
CARD
SMCZ vs. CARD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF (SMCZ) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMCZ | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 0.95 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | -0.72 | -0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.00 | -1.06 | -0.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMCZ | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.57 | -0.52 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.58 | -0.65 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
SMCZ vs. CARD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMCZ drawdown since its inception was -97.40%, roughly equal to the maximum CARD drawdown of -93.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCZ and CARD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMCZ | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.40% | -93.51% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -91.74% | -49.57% | -42.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.12% | -92.68% | -4.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.71% | -68.13% | -7.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.99% | 33.93% | +11.06% |
Volatility
SMCZ vs. CARD - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF (SMCZ) has a higher volatility of 80.07% compared to Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) at 22.80%. This indicates that SMCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CARD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMCZ | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 80.07% | 22.80% | +57.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 131.65% | 50.05% | +81.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 156.87% | 68.70% | +88.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 163.39% | 80.53% | +82.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 163.39% | 80.53% | +82.86% |
SMCZ vs. CARD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMCZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than CARD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMCZ vs. CARD - Dividend Comparison
SMCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.59%, while CARD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMCZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF | 20.59% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMCZ and CARD have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMCZ has higher volatility (80.07%) compared to CARD (22.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCZ dropped -97.40% vs CARD's -93.51%.
On 1-year performance, CARD leads with -35.78% vs -89.94% for SMCZ. On fees, CARD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, CARD has been the lower-risk option at 22.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CARD has performed better with a -35.78% return vs -89.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CARD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMCZ.
SMCZ has the higher dividend yield at 20.59%, compared with 0.00% for CARD.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Max. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for SMCZ and 0.95% for CARD.
CARD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.52 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMCZ and CARD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer