SMCWX vs. VT
SMCWX (American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both funds - SMCWX is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund managed by American Funds, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Over the past 10 years, SMCWX returned 10.60%/yr vs 13.25%/yr for VT. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMCWX charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
SMCWX vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMCWX achieves a 14.59% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 10.43% return. Over the past 10 years, SMCWX has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 10.60%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.25% annualized return.
SMCWX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 14.59%
- 6M
- 12.91%
- 1Y
- 24.02%
- 3Y*
- 13.41%
- 5Y*
- 1.83%
- 10Y*
- 10.60%
VT
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- YTD
- 10.43%
- 6M
- 9.42%
- 1Y
- 24.79%
- 3Y*
- 20.08%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- 13.25%
SMCWX vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMCWX American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A | 14.59% | 14.07% | 2.33% | 18.86% | -29.90% | 10.14% | 37.46% | 30.79% | -9.75% | 26.85% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 10.43% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMCWX and VT is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008 | 0.91 |
The correlation between SMCWX and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMCWX vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
SMCWX
VT
SMCWX vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMCWX | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.34 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 2.57 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.97 | 11.09 | -3.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMCWX vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMCWX drawdown since its inception was -62.46%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCWX and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMCWX | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.46% | -50.27% | -12.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.83% | -9.67% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.40% | -16.51% | -4.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.79% | -26.38% | -13.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.79% | -34.24% | -5.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.93% | -2.47% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.89% | -7.00% | -7.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 2.24% | +0.74% |
Volatility
SMCWX vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX) has a higher volatility of 6.86% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 5.53%. This indicates that SMCWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMCWX | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.86% | 5.53% | +1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.07% | 11.28% | +2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.88% | 13.51% | +3.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.40% | 16.19% | +2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 17.19% | +0.73% |
SMCWX vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMCWX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMCWX vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
SMCWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, more than VT's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMCWX American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A | 4.20% | 4.84% | 0.60% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 9.24% | 1.60% | 4.24% | 7.06% | 4.48% | 0.35% | 6.49% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.60% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMCWX and VT have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMCWX has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to VT (5.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCWX dropped -62.46% vs VT's -50.27%.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMCWX and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer