SMCVX vs. ECSIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SMCVX (ALPS/Smith Credit Opportunities Fund) and ECSIX (Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, SMCVX returned 1.12%/yr vs 4.07%/yr for ECSIX. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMCVX charges 1.17%/yr vs 1.82%/yr for ECSIX.

Performance

SMCVX vs. ECSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS/Smith Credit Opportunities Fund (SMCVX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund (ECSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMCVX achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly lower than ECSIX's 1.76% return.

SMCVX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.70%
• YTD: 1.08%
• 6M: 0.76%
• 1Y: 5.65%
• 3Y*: 5.77%
• 5Y*: 1.12%
• 10Y*: —

ECSIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 1.76%
• 6M: 2.21%
• 1Y: 9.05%
• 3Y*: 7.54%
• 5Y*: 4.07%
• 10Y*: 3.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMCVX vs. ECSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SMCVX ALPS/Smith Credit Opportunities Fund	1.08%	5.21%	4.93%	7.29%	-12.95%	2.62%	4.69%
ECSIX Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund	1.76%	10.19%	5.71%	7.31%	-3.31%	0.69%	2.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SMCVX and ECSIX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020	0.57

The correlation between SMCVX and ECSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.73 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SMCVX vs. ECSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMCVX

SMCVX Risk / Return Rank: 45
SMCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
SMCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
SMCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
SMCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
SMCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

ECSIX

ECSIX Risk / Return Rank: 86
ECSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ECSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
ECSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
ECSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
ECSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMCVX vs. ECSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS/Smith Credit Opportunities Fund (SMCVX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund (ECSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMCVX	ECSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	3.21	-1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	4.94	-2.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.70	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	3.74	-1.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.92	13.36	-3.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMCVX vs. ECSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMCVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is lower than the ECSIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMCVX and ECSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMCVX	ECSIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.01	3.21	-1.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	1.28	-1.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	1.47	-0.96

Drawdowns

SMCVX vs. ECSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCVX drawdown since its inception was -16.11%, which is greater than ECSIX's maximum drawdown of -12.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCVX and ECSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMCVX	ECSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.11%	-12.95%	-3.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.71%	-2.43%	-0.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.73%	-2.64%	-1.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.11%	-7.19%	-8.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-12.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-0.78%	+0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.00%	-1.34%	-3.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.58%	0.68%	-0.10%

Volatility

SMCVX vs. ECSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ALPS/Smith Credit Opportunities Fund (SMCVX) is 1.04%, while Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund (ECSIX) has a volatility of 1.12%. This indicates that SMCVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMCVX	ECSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.04%	1.12%	-0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.33%	2.20%	+0.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.89%	2.83%	+0.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.16%	3.21%	+0.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.03%	3.18%	+0.85%

SMCVX vs. ECSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCVX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is lower than ECSIX's 1.82% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMCVX vs. ECSIX - Dividend Comparison

SMCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, less than ECSIX's 6.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ECSIX Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund	6.33%	5.07%	6.21%	6.18%	4.78%	3.54%	3.47%	3.53%	3.19%	2.96%	3.20%	3.54%
SMCVX ALPS/Smith Credit Opportunities Fund	4.98%	4.74%	4.60%	4.15%	2.21%	2.40%	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMCVX and ECSIX in my portfolio?

SMCVX and ECSIX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMCVX or ECSIX?

ECSIX has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to SMCVX (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCVX dropped -16.11% vs ECSIX's -12.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ECSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.