PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMCIX vs. CSMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMCIX vs. CSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Shelton Capital Management S&P Smallcap Index Fund (SMCIX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMCIX achieves a 19.98% return, which is significantly higher than CSMDX's 12.52% return.


SMCIX

1D
0.24%
1M
4.90%
YTD
19.98%
6M
17.60%
1Y
34.69%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
8.62%
10Y*
11.78%

CSMDX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.48%
YTD
12.52%
6M
10.49%
1Y
16.11%
3Y*
8.82%
5Y*
5.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMCIX vs. CSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMCIX
Shelton Capital Management S&P Smallcap Index Fund
19.98%6.90%18.13%15.48%-16.41%26.53%11.27%30.68%-9.07%1.12%
CSMDX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund
12.52%2.72%2.24%18.89%-14.89%22.60%8.29%29.90%-5.20%10.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SMCIX and CSMDX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2017

0.92

The correlation between SMCIX and CSMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMCIX vs. CSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMCIX
SMCIX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SMCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SMCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

CSMDX
CSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMCIX vs. CSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shelton Capital Management S&P Smallcap Index Fund (SMCIX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMCIXCSMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.21

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.16

1.90

+2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.98

5.82

+8.16

SMCIX vs. CSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMCIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the CSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMCIX and CSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMCIX vs. CSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCIX drawdown since its inception was -58.13%, which is greater than CSMDX's maximum drawdown of -37.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCIX and CSMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMCIXCSMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.13%

-37.28%

-20.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.79%

-9.20%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.52%

-24.60%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.72%

-24.60%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.23%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.52%

-5.74%

-3.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

3.00%

-0.39%

Volatility

SMCIX vs. CSMDX - Volatility Comparison

Shelton Capital Management S&P Smallcap Index Fund (SMCIX) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX) at 4.09%. This indicates that SMCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMCIXCSMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

4.09%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.10%

10.59%

+1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.76%

14.69%

+3.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.85%

18.18%

+3.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.65%

19.15%

+4.50%

SMCIX vs. CSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCIX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than CSMDX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMCIX vs. CSMDX - Dividend Comparison

SMCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.79%, more than CSMDX's 2.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSMDX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund
2.79%3.14%1.33%0.81%4.07%6.67%0.38%2.61%4.40%0.13%0.00%0.00%
SMCIX
Shelton Capital Management S&P Smallcap Index Fund
7.79%10.78%19.88%3.48%10.40%9.40%4.53%13.88%9.39%1.63%4.64%11.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SMCIX and CSMDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SMCIX has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to CSMDX (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCIX dropped -58.13% vs CSMDX's -37.28%.

SMCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMCIX and CSMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer