SMAP vs. SCHA

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

SMAP (Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF) and SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. SMAP is actively managed, while SCHA is passively managed. SMAP charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHA.

Performance

SMAP vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SMAP

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHA

• 1D: -3.41%
• 1M: -1.01%
• YTD: 16.69%
• 6M: 15.72%
• 1Y: 36.92%
• 3Y*: 17.38%
• 5Y*: 6.57%
• 10Y*: 10.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMAP vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SMAP	SCHA
Industrials	22.3%	15.4%
Healthcare	17.5%	13.5%
Technology	13.9%	23.3%
Financial Services	13.1%	15.7%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	9.0%
Basic Materials	7.9%	4.2%
Energy	6.6%	5.5%
Real Estate	5.6%	6.0%
Consumer Defensive	2.0%	2.6%
Communication Services	-	2.4%
Utilities	-	2.3%

Return for Risk

SMAP vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHA

SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 67
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 57
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMAP vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMAP	SCHA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.57	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	SMAP	SCHA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-42.41%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.50%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.29%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.79%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-3.41%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-7.58%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.59%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SMAP	SCHA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.92%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.26%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	18.30%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	21.98%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	22.73%	—

SMAP vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMAP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMAP vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison

SMAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF	1.03%	1.26%	1.51%	1.42%	1.37%	1.19%	1.05%	1.39%	1.58%	1.24%	1.50%	1.48%
SMAP Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, SMAP or SCHA?

On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMAP or SCHA?

SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SMAP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMAP or SCHA?

SCHA has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for SMAP.

What is the main difference between SMAP and SCHA?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SMAP and 0.04% for SCHA.