SLYV vs. VXUS
SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLYV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLYV returned 10.08%/yr vs 9.35%/yr for VXUS. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SLYV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
SLYV vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLYV achieves a 20.28% return, which is significantly higher than VXUS's 11.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SLYV has outperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 10.08%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively lower 9.35% annualized return.
SLYV
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 12.38%
- YTD
- 20.28%
- 1Y
- 32.51%
- 3Y*
- 12.94%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.74%
VXUS
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- 6M
- 5.45%
- YTD
- 11.16%
- 1Y
- 21.77%
- 3Y*
- 16.57%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.46%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $13.68M | $20.85M | $23.13M | |
| $386.57M | $447.19M | $513.76M |
SLYV vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 20.28% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.82% | -11.08% | 30.57% | 2.68% | 24.26% | -12.77% | 11.74% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 11.16% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 10.66% | 21.75% | -14.43% | 27.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLYV and VXUS is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011 | 0.70 |
The correlation between SLYV and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
SLYV vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLYV
VXUS
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
SLYV
VXUS
Consumer Cyclical
SLYV
VXUS
Industrials
SLYV
VXUS
Technology
SLYV
VXUS
Real Estate
SLYV
VXUS
Energy
SLYV
VXUS
Healthcare
SLYV
VXUS
Basic Materials
SLYV
VXUS
Consumer Defensive
SLYV
VXUS
Communication Services
SLYV
VXUS
Utilities
SLYV
VXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLYV vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
SLYV
VXUS
SLYV vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLYV | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.24 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | 1.92 | +1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.10 | 7.12 | +4.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLYV vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLYV | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.15% | -35.97% | -25.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -11.27% | +1.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.68% | -13.58% | -15.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.68% | -29.44% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.73% | -35.97% | -11.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -4.20% | +2.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.90% | -8.17% | -0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 3.04% | -0.28% |
Volatility
SLYV vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) is 3.61%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that SLYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLYV | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 4.58% | -0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.21% | 14.83% | -3.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.81% | 16.66% | +1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.70% | 16.31% | +5.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.89% | 17.00% | +6.89% |
SLYV vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SLYV vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than VXUS's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 1.82% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.62% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLYV and VXUS have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VXUS has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to SLYV (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 10-year performance, SLYV leads with 10.08% vs 9.35% for VXUS. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLYV has performed better with a 10.08% return vs 9.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYV.
VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 1.82% for SLYV.
SLYV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYV and 0.05% for VXUS.
SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLYV and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer