SLYV vs. IXC
SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLYV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLYV returned 10.53%/yr vs 9.93%/yr for IXC. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SLYV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IXC.
Performance
SLYV vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLYV achieves a 18.18% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 28.81% return. Over the past 10 years, SLYV has outperformed IXC with an annualized return of 10.53%, while IXC has yielded a comparatively lower 9.93% annualized return.
SLYV
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- YTD
- 18.18%
- 6M
- 14.15%
- 1Y
- 36.99%
- 3Y*
- 14.26%
- 5Y*
- 6.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.53%
IXC
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- 28.81%
- 6M
- 27.41%
- 1Y
- 39.54%
- 3Y*
- 17.54%
- 5Y*
- 19.08%
- 10Y*
- 9.93%
SLYV vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 18.18% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.82% | -11.08% | 30.57% | 2.68% | 24.26% | -12.77% | 11.74% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 28.81% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 48.51% | 40.88% | -31.00% | 12.67% | -14.85% | 5.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLYV and IXC is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2001 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SLYV and IXC has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SLYV vs. IXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLYV
IXC
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SLYV
IXC
-
Consumer Cyclical
SLYV
IXC
-
Industrials
SLYV
IXC
-
Technology
SLYV
IXC
-
Real Estate
SLYV
IXC
-
Energy
SLYV
IXC
Healthcare
SLYV
IXC
-
Basic Materials
SLYV
IXC
-
Communication Services
SLYV
IXC
-
Consumer Defensive
SLYV
IXC
-
Utilities
SLYV
IXC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLYV vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
SLYV
IXC
SLYV vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLYV | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.35 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | 4.11 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.17 | 11.84 | +1.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLYV vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLYV | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.15% | -67.88% | +6.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -9.66% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.68% | -19.06% | -9.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.68% | -24.93% | -3.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.73% | -64.16% | +16.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.29% | +7.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.94% | -17.47% | +8.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 3.35% | -0.53% |
Volatility
SLYV vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) is 4.80%, while iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that SLYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLYV | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | 6.43% | -1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.74% | 15.64% | -3.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.30% | 18.83% | -0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 23.54% | -1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.96% | 26.84% | -2.88% |
SLYV vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IXC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLYV vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than IXC's 2.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.86% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 1.77% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLYV and IXC have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IXC has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to SLYV (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs IXC's -67.88%.
On 10-year performance, SLYV leads with 10.53% vs 9.93% for IXC. On fees, SLYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLYV has performed better with a 10.53% return vs 9.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IXC.
IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 1.77% for SLYV.
SLYV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while IXC is Energy Equities. SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while IXC tracks S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYV and 0.40% for IXC.
IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLYV and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer