SLYV vs. GLD
SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - SLYV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLYV returned 10.18%/yr vs 13.12%/yr for GLD. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLYV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.
Performance
SLYV vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLYV achieves a 15.25% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 2.92% return. Over the past 10 years, SLYV has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 10.18%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.12% annualized return.
SLYV
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 15.25%
- 6M
- 14.70%
- 1Y
- 37.01%
- 3Y*
- 14.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.18%
GLD
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 32.04%
- 3Y*
- 31.09%
- 5Y*
- 18.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
SLYV vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 15.25% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.82% | -11.08% | 30.57% | 2.68% | 24.26% | -12.77% | 11.74% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 2.92% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLYV and GLD is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2004 | 0.06 |
The correlation between SLYV and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (10 years) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SLYV vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLYV
GLD
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SLYV
GLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
SLYV
GLD
-
Industrials
SLYV
GLD
-
Technology
SLYV
GLD
-
Real Estate
SLYV
GLD
-
Energy
SLYV
GLD
-
Healthcare
SLYV
GLD
-
Basic Materials
SLYV
GLD
Communication Services
SLYV
GLD
-
Consumer Defensive
SLYV
GLD
-
Utilities
SLYV
GLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLYV vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
SLYV
GLD
SLYV vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLYV | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.24 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | 1.68 | +2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.09 | 4.15 | +8.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLYV | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 1.21 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 1.01 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.83 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.60 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
SLYV vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLYV | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.15% | -45.56% | -15.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -19.21% | +9.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.68% | -19.21% | -9.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.68% | -21.03% | -7.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.73% | -22.00% | -25.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -17.75% | +16.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.94% | -16.16% | +7.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 7.73% | -4.90% |
Volatility
SLYV vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) is 4.42%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 5.51%. This indicates that SLYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLYV | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 5.51% | -1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.46% | 23.16% | -11.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.26% | 26.61% | -8.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 18.00% | +3.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.96% | 15.95% | +8.01% |
SLYV vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLYV vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 1.82% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLYV and GLD have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLD has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to SLYV (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs GLD's -45.56%.
On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 13.12% vs 10.18% for SLYV. On fees, SLYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 13.12% return vs 10.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.
SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
SLYV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while GLD is Gold. SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYV and 0.40% for GLD.
SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLYV and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer