SLYV vs. FTSL
SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) and FTSL (First Trust Senior Loan Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SLYV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while FTSL is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by First Trust. SLYV is passively managed, while FTSL is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLYV returned 10.18%/yr vs 4.45%/yr for FTSL. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLYV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for FTSL.
Performance
SLYV vs. FTSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLYV achieves a 15.25% return, which is significantly higher than FTSL's 0.62% return. Over the past 10 years, SLYV has outperformed FTSL with an annualized return of 10.18%, while FTSL has yielded a comparatively lower 4.45% annualized return.
SLYV
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 15.25%
- 6M
- 14.70%
- 1Y
- 37.01%
- 3Y*
- 14.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.18%
FTSL
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 0.99%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 7.34%
- 5Y*
- 5.02%
- 10Y*
- 4.45%
SLYV vs. FTSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 15.25% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.82% | -11.08% | 30.57% | 2.68% | 24.26% | -12.77% | 11.74% |
FTSL First Trust Senior Loan Fund | 0.62% | 5.98% | 8.27% | 11.58% | -2.50% | 3.94% | 2.99% | 10.11% | -1.30% | 2.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLYV and FTSL is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2013 | 0.33 |
The correlation between SLYV and FTSL shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SLYV vs. FTSL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLYV
FTSL
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SLYV
FTSL
-
Consumer Cyclical
SLYV
FTSL
-
Industrials
SLYV
FTSL
-
Technology
SLYV
FTSL
-
Real Estate
SLYV
FTSL
-
Energy
SLYV
FTSL
-
Healthcare
SLYV
FTSL
-
Basic Materials
SLYV
FTSL
Communication Services
SLYV
FTSL
-
Consumer Defensive
SLYV
FTSL
-
Utilities
SLYV
FTSL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLYV vs. FTSL — Risk / Return Rank
SLYV
FTSL
SLYV vs. FTSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLYV | FTSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.51 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | 1.95 | +2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.09 | 7.25 | +5.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLYV | FTSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 2.15 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 1.50 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.86 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.85 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
SLYV vs. FTSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than FTSL's maximum drawdown of -22.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and FTSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLYV | FTSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.15% | -22.67% | -38.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -2.33% | -7.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.68% | -2.66% | -26.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.68% | -6.96% | -21.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.73% | -22.67% | -25.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -0.03% | -1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.94% | -0.76% | -8.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 0.63% | +2.20% |
Volatility
SLYV vs. FTSL - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to First Trust Senior Loan Fund (FTSL) at 0.36%. This indicates that SLYV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLYV | FTSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 0.36% | +4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.46% | 1.95% | +9.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.26% | 2.11% | +16.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 3.35% | +18.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.96% | 5.19% | +18.77% |
SLYV vs. FTSL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FTSL's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLYV vs. FTSL - Dividend Comparison
SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than FTSL's 6.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTSL First Trust Senior Loan Fund | 6.46% | 6.59% | 7.56% | 7.59% | 4.77% | 3.17% | 3.48% | 4.44% | 4.29% | 3.64% | 3.70% | 3.95% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 1.82% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLYV and FTSL have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLYV has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to FTSL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs FTSL's -22.67%.
On 10-year performance, SLYV leads with 10.18% vs 4.45% for FTSL. On fees, SLYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FTSL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLYV has performed better with a 10.18% return vs 4.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for FTSL.
FTSL has the higher dividend yield at 6.46%, compared with 1.82% for SLYV.
SLYV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while FTSL is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYV and 0.86% for FTSL.
FTSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLYV and FTSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer