PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLYV vs. CSSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLYV vs. CSSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. (CSSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLYV achieves a 15.25% return, which is significantly higher than CSSPX's 6.71% return. Over the past 10 years, SLYV has outperformed CSSPX with an annualized return of 10.18%, while CSSPX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.07% annualized return.


SLYV

1D
-1.18%
1M
2.30%
YTD
15.25%
6M
14.70%
1Y
37.01%
3Y*
14.08%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
10.18%

CSSPX

1D
0.24%
1M
-2.35%
YTD
6.71%
6M
6.31%
1Y
11.23%
3Y*
8.81%
5Y*
1.29%
10Y*
5.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLYV vs. CSSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
15.25%6.54%7.28%14.82%-11.08%30.57%2.68%24.26%-12.77%11.74%
CSSPX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc.
6.71%10.61%0.84%10.75%-25.08%26.46%-2.35%24.80%-3.86%12.95%

Correlation

The correlation between SLYV and CSSPX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.60

The correlation between SLYV and CSSPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLYV vs. CSSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLYV
SLYV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SLYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYV Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

CSSPX
CSSPX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CSSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
CSSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLYV vs. CSSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. (CSSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLYVCSSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.17

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

1.08

+2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.09

4.07

+9.02

SLYV vs. CSSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLYV Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the CSSPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLYV and CSSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLYVCSSPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

0.93

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.08

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.30

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.36

+0.10

Drawdowns

SLYV vs. CSSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than CSSPX's maximum drawdown of -40.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and CSSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLYVCSSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.15%

-40.47%

-20.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-10.05%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.68%

-18.16%

-10.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.68%

-32.72%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.73%

-40.47%

-7.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-3.98%

+2.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.94%

-8.39%

-0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

2.64%

+0.19%

Volatility

SLYV vs. CSSPX - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. (CSSPX) at 3.51%. This indicates that SLYV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLYVCSSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

3.51%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.46%

8.94%

+2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.26%

11.66%

+6.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.96%

15.94%

+6.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.96%

17.03%

+6.93%

SLYV vs. CSSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CSSPX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLYV vs. CSSPX - Dividend Comparison

SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than CSSPX's 3.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSSPX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc.
3.24%3.46%2.78%2.85%3.02%3.21%2.41%8.61%3.95%2.79%6.89%2.68%
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
1.82%2.02%2.30%2.11%1.47%1.94%1.40%1.67%2.14%5.53%2.18%6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLYV and CSSPX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLYV has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to CSSPX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs CSSPX's -40.47%.

SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLYV and CSSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer