PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLYG vs. VBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLYG vs. VBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLYG achieves a 22.87% return, which is significantly higher than VBR's 14.21% return. Over the past 10 years, SLYG has outperformed VBR with an annualized return of 11.84%, while VBR has yielded a comparatively lower 11.10% annualized return.


SLYG

1D
1.27%
1M
6.87%
YTD
22.87%
6M
18.91%
1Y
32.06%
3Y*
17.21%
5Y*
6.48%
10Y*
11.84%

VBR

1D
0.81%
1M
3.37%
YTD
14.21%
6M
12.35%
1Y
26.15%
3Y*
17.22%
5Y*
8.60%
10Y*
11.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLYG vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
22.87%5.20%9.38%17.27%-21.26%22.42%19.48%20.97%-4.20%14.62%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
14.21%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SLYG and VBR is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.92

The correlation between SLYG and VBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

SLYG vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLYG
VBR

Technology

19.9%
12.1%

Industrials

18.9%
17.4%

Healthcare

15.1%
8.3%

Financial Services

13.6%
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
12.5%

Real Estate

6.3%
10.5%

Energy

4.6%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
4.0%

Communication Services

2.9%
2.8%

Basic Materials

2.8%
6.0%

Utilities

1.8%
4.6%

Technology

SLYG
19.9%
VBR
12.1%

Industrials

SLYG
18.9%
VBR
17.4%

Healthcare

SLYG
15.1%
VBR
8.3%

Financial Services

SLYG
13.6%
VBR
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SLYG
11.0%
VBR
12.5%

Real Estate

SLYG
6.3%
VBR
10.5%

Energy

SLYG
4.6%
VBR
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

SLYG
3.0%
VBR
4.0%

Communication Services

SLYG
2.9%
VBR
2.8%

Basic Materials

SLYG
2.8%
VBR
6.0%

Utilities

SLYG
1.8%
VBR
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLYG vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLYG
SLYG Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SLYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYG Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLYG vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLYGVBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.30

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

2.97

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.46

10.48

+1.98

SLYG vs. VBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the VBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLYG and VBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLYG vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLYG drawdown since its inception was -62.92%, roughly equal to the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYG and VBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLYGVBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.92%

-61.98%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-8.85%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.39%

-24.19%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.18%

-24.19%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.86%

-45.28%

+3.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.34%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.88%

-8.25%

-6.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

2.50%

+0.08%

Volatility

SLYG vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) at 3.97%. This indicates that SLYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLYGVBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

3.97%

+1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.02%

10.69%

+2.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.93%

15.29%

+2.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.56%

19.73%

+1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.74%

21.71%

+1.03%

SLYG vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLYG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SLYG vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison

SLYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than VBR's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
0.66%0.86%1.22%1.18%1.18%0.68%0.71%1.08%1.06%4.74%1.13%5.75%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.72%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SLYG and VBR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SLYG has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to VBR (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYG dropped -62.92% vs VBR's -61.98%.

On 10-year performance, SLYG leads with 11.84% vs 11.10% for VBR. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLYG has performed better with a 11.84% return vs 11.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYG.

VBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.66% for SLYG.

SLYG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while VBR is Small Cap Value Equities. SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYG and 0.05% for VBR.

SLYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLYG and VBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer