SLYG vs. VBR
SLYG (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF) and VBR (Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLYG is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while VBR is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLYG returned 11.84%/yr vs 11.10%/yr for VBR. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SLYG charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VBR.
Performance
SLYG vs. VBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLYG achieves a 22.87% return, which is significantly higher than VBR's 14.21% return. Over the past 10 years, SLYG has outperformed VBR with an annualized return of 11.84%, while VBR has yielded a comparatively lower 11.10% annualized return.
SLYG
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 6.87%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 18.91%
- 1Y
- 32.06%
- 3Y*
- 17.21%
- 5Y*
- 6.48%
- 10Y*
- 11.84%
VBR
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 14.21%
- 6M
- 12.35%
- 1Y
- 26.15%
- 3Y*
- 17.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.10%
SLYG vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 22.87% | 5.20% | 9.38% | 17.27% | -21.26% | 22.42% | 19.48% | 20.97% | -4.20% | 14.62% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 14.21% | 9.09% | 12.40% | 16.00% | -9.38% | 28.08% | 5.90% | 22.78% | -12.28% | 11.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLYG and VBR is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.92 |
The correlation between SLYG and VBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
SLYG vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLYG
VBR
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
SLYG
VBR
Industrials
SLYG
VBR
Healthcare
SLYG
VBR
Financial Services
SLYG
VBR
Consumer Cyclical
SLYG
VBR
Real Estate
SLYG
VBR
Energy
SLYG
VBR
Consumer Defensive
SLYG
VBR
Communication Services
SLYG
VBR
Basic Materials
SLYG
VBR
Utilities
SLYG
VBR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLYG vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank
SLYG
VBR
SLYG vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLYG | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.30 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | 2.97 | +0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.46 | 10.48 | +1.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLYG vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLYG drawdown since its inception was -62.92%, roughly equal to the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYG and VBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLYG | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.92% | -61.98% | -0.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.10% | -8.85% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.39% | -24.19% | -3.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.18% | -24.19% | -4.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.86% | -45.28% | +3.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.34% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.88% | -8.25% | -6.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 2.50% | +0.08% |
Volatility
SLYG vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) at 3.97%. This indicates that SLYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLYG | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 3.97% | +1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.02% | 10.69% | +2.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.93% | 15.29% | +2.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.56% | 19.73% | +1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.74% | 21.71% | +1.03% |
SLYG vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLYG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SLYG vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison
SLYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than VBR's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 0.66% | 0.86% | 1.22% | 1.18% | 1.18% | 0.68% | 0.71% | 1.08% | 1.06% | 4.74% | 1.13% | 5.75% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.72% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, SLYG and VBR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SLYG has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to VBR (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYG dropped -62.92% vs VBR's -61.98%.
On 10-year performance, SLYG leads with 11.84% vs 11.10% for VBR. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLYG has performed better with a 11.84% return vs 11.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYG.
VBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.66% for SLYG.
SLYG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while VBR is Small Cap Value Equities. SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYG and 0.05% for VBR.
SLYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLYG and VBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer