PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLYG vs. VBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLYG vs. VBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLYG achieves a 25.05% return, which is significantly higher than VBR's 18.17% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SLYG having a 11.12% annualized return and VBR not far behind at 10.67%.


SLYG

1D
1.82%
1M
-0.05%
6M
17.84%
YTD
25.05%
1Y
34.81%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
11.12%
ALL TIME*
7.51%

VBR

1D
1.27%
1M
1.85%
6M
11.26%
YTD
18.17%
1Y
29.28%
3Y*
15.36%
5Y*
10.29%
10Y*
10.67%
ALL TIME*
9.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.04M$11.74M$13.56M
$57.38M$55.84M$67.82M

SLYG vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
25.05%5.20%9.38%17.27%-21.26%22.42%19.48%20.97%-4.20%14.62%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
18.17%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SLYG and VBR is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.92

The correlation between SLYG and VBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

SLYG vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLYG
VBR

Industrials

19.0%
17.3%

Technology

17.7%
10.9%

Healthcare

17.2%
8.4%

Financial Services

13.9%
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
13.6%

Real Estate

6.8%
11.1%

Energy

3.8%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
4.2%

Basic Materials

3.1%
5.3%

Communication Services

2.7%
2.4%

Utilities

1.6%
4.9%

Industrials

SLYG
19.0%
VBR
17.3%

Technology

SLYG
17.7%
VBR
10.9%

Healthcare

SLYG
17.2%
VBR
8.4%

Financial Services

SLYG
13.9%
VBR
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SLYG
11.1%
VBR
13.6%

Real Estate

SLYG
6.8%
VBR
11.1%

Energy

SLYG
3.8%
VBR
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

SLYG
3.3%
VBR
4.2%

Basic Materials

SLYG
3.1%
VBR
5.3%

Communication Services

SLYG
2.7%
VBR
2.4%

Utilities

SLYG
1.6%
VBR
4.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLYG vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SLYG
SLYG Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SLYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYG Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYG Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SLYG vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLYGVBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.35

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

3.32

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.09

12.14

+0.95

SLYG vs. VBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the VBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLYG and VBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLYG vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLYG drawdown since its inception was -62.92%, roughly equal to the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYG and VBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLYGVBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.92%

-61.98%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-8.85%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.39%

-24.19%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.18%

-24.19%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.86%

-45.28%

+3.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-0.15%

-1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.83%

-8.21%

-6.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

2.42%

+0.25%

Volatility

SLYG vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) at 3.58%. This indicates that SLYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLYGVBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

3.58%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.96%

10.28%

+2.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.81%

14.86%

+2.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.51%

19.57%

+1.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.73%

21.67%

+1.06%

SLYG vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLYG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SLYG vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison

SLYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than VBR's 1.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
0.65%0.86%1.22%1.18%1.18%0.68%0.71%1.08%1.06%4.74%1.13%5.75%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.74%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLYG and VBR have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLYG has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to VBR (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYG dropped -62.92% vs VBR's -61.98%.

On 10-year performance, SLYG leads with 11.12% vs 10.67% for VBR. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLYG has performed better with a 11.12% return vs 10.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYG.

VBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.65% for SLYG.

SLYG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while VBR is Small Cap Value Equities. SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYG and 0.05% for VBR.

VBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLYG and VBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer