SLYG vs. GLD
SLYG (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - SLYG is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLYG returned 10.83%/yr vs 13.12%/yr for GLD. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLYG charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.
Performance
SLYG vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLYG achieves a 15.50% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 2.92% return. Over the past 10 years, SLYG has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 10.83%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.12% annualized return.
SLYG
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- 15.50%
- 6M
- 13.61%
- 1Y
- 26.20%
- 3Y*
- 14.46%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- 10.83%
GLD
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 32.04%
- 3Y*
- 31.09%
- 5Y*
- 18.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
SLYG vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 15.50% | 5.20% | 9.38% | 17.27% | -21.26% | 22.42% | 19.48% | 20.97% | -4.20% | 14.62% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 2.92% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLYG and GLD is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2004 | 0.07 |
The correlation between SLYG and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (10 years) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SLYG vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLYG
GLD
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Technology
SLYG
GLD
-
Industrials
SLYG
GLD
-
Healthcare
SLYG
GLD
-
Financial Services
SLYG
GLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
SLYG
GLD
-
Real Estate
SLYG
GLD
-
Energy
SLYG
GLD
-
Communication Services
SLYG
GLD
-
Consumer Defensive
SLYG
GLD
-
Basic Materials
SLYG
GLD
Utilities
SLYG
GLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLYG vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
SLYG
GLD
SLYG vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLYG | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.24 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 1.68 | +1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.11 | 4.15 | +5.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLYG | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 1.21 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 1.01 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.83 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.60 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
SLYG vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLYG drawdown since its inception was -62.15%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYG and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLYG | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.15% | -45.56% | -16.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.10% | -19.21% | +10.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.39% | -19.21% | -8.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.18% | -21.03% | -8.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.86% | -22.00% | -19.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -17.75% | +16.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.55% | -16.16% | +1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 7.73% | -5.13% |
Volatility
SLYG vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) is 4.59%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 5.51%. This indicates that SLYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLYG | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | 5.51% | -0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.47% | 23.16% | -10.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.57% | 26.61% | -9.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.51% | 18.00% | +3.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.74% | 15.95% | +6.79% |
SLYG vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLYG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLYG vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
SLYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 0.71% | 0.86% | 1.22% | 1.18% | 1.18% | 0.68% | 0.71% | 1.08% | 1.06% | 4.74% | 1.13% | 5.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLYG and GLD have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLD has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to SLYG (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYG dropped -62.15% vs GLD's -45.56%.
On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 13.12% vs 10.83% for SLYG. On fees, SLYG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SLYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 13.12% return vs 10.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLYG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.
SLYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
SLYG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while GLD is Gold. SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYG and 0.40% for GLD.
SLYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLYG and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer