PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLYG vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLYG vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLYG achieves a 15.50% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 2.92% return. Over the past 10 years, SLYG has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 10.83%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.12% annualized return.


SLYG

1D
-0.58%
1M
0.98%
YTD
15.50%
6M
13.61%
1Y
26.20%
3Y*
14.46%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*
10.83%

GLD

1D
-0.99%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
2.92%
6M
5.43%
1Y
32.04%
3Y*
31.09%
5Y*
18.15%
10Y*
13.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLYG vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
15.50%5.20%9.38%17.27%-21.26%22.42%19.48%20.97%-4.20%14.62%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
2.92%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SLYG and GLD is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2004

0.07

The correlation between SLYG and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (10 years) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SLYG vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLYG
GLD

Technology

20.1%

-

Industrials

19.5%

-

Healthcare

14.4%

-

Financial Services

13.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%

-

Real Estate

6.4%

-

Energy

5.1%

-

Communication Services

2.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.8%

-

Basic Materials

2.8%
100.0%

Utilities

1.9%

-

Technology

SLYG
20.1%
GLD

-

Industrials

SLYG
19.5%
GLD

-

Healthcare

SLYG
14.4%
GLD

-

Financial Services

SLYG
13.9%
GLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

SLYG
10.4%
GLD

-

Real Estate

SLYG
6.4%
GLD

-

Energy

SLYG
5.1%
GLD

-

Communication Services

SLYG
2.8%
GLD

-

Consumer Defensive

SLYG
2.8%
GLD

-

Basic Materials

SLYG
2.8%
GLD
100.0%

Utilities

SLYG
1.9%
GLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLYG vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLYG
SLYG Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SLYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLYG vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLYGGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.24

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

1.68

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.11

4.15

+5.96

SLYG vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLYG and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLYGGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

1.21

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

1.01

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.83

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.60

-0.29

Drawdowns

SLYG vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLYG drawdown since its inception was -62.15%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYG and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLYGGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.15%

-45.56%

-16.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-19.21%

+10.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.39%

-19.21%

-8.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.18%

-21.03%

-8.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.86%

-22.00%

-19.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-17.75%

+16.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.55%

-16.16%

+1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

7.73%

-5.13%

Volatility

SLYG vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) is 4.59%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 5.51%. This indicates that SLYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLYGGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

5.51%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.47%

23.16%

-10.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.57%

26.61%

-9.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.51%

18.00%

+3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.74%

15.95%

+6.79%

SLYG vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLYG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLYG vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

SLYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
0.71%0.86%1.22%1.18%1.18%0.68%0.71%1.08%1.06%4.74%1.13%5.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLYG and GLD have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLD has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to SLYG (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYG dropped -62.15% vs GLD's -45.56%.

On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 13.12% vs 10.83% for SLYG. On fees, SLYG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SLYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 13.12% return vs 10.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLYG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

SLYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

SLYG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while GLD is Gold. SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYG and 0.40% for GLD.

SLYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLYG and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer