PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLYG vs. BKSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLYG vs. BKSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLYG achieves a 25.05% return, which is significantly higher than BKSE's 20.27% return.


SLYG

1D
1.82%
1M
-0.05%
6M
17.84%
YTD
25.05%
1Y
34.81%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
11.12%
ALL TIME*
7.51%

BKSE

1D
1.78%
1M
1.08%
6M
13.72%
YTD
20.27%
1Y
37.25%
3Y*
16.98%
5Y*
9.11%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$343.03K$235.90K$242.30K
$11.04M$11.74M$13.56M

SLYG vs. BKSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
25.05%5.20%9.38%17.27%-21.26%22.42%60.58%
BKSE
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF
20.27%13.09%9.56%22.37%-18.44%16.18%53.89%

Correlation

The correlation between SLYG and BKSE is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2020

0.96

The correlation between SLYG and BKSE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SLYG vs. BKSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLYG
BKSE

Industrials

19.0%
14.9%

Technology

17.7%
16.0%

Healthcare

17.2%
14.2%

Financial Services

13.9%
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
13.5%

Real Estate

6.8%
7.2%

Energy

3.8%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
2.6%

Basic Materials

3.1%
4.3%

Communication Services

2.7%
2.0%

Utilities

1.6%
3.1%

Industrials

SLYG
19.0%
BKSE
14.9%

Technology

SLYG
17.7%
BKSE
16.0%

Healthcare

SLYG
17.2%
BKSE
14.2%

Financial Services

SLYG
13.9%
BKSE
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SLYG
11.1%
BKSE
13.5%

Real Estate

SLYG
6.8%
BKSE
7.2%

Energy

SLYG
3.8%
BKSE
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

SLYG
3.3%
BKSE
2.6%

Basic Materials

SLYG
3.1%
BKSE
4.3%

Communication Services

SLYG
2.7%
BKSE
2.0%

Utilities

SLYG
1.6%
BKSE
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLYG vs. BKSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SLYG
SLYG Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SLYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYG Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYG Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

BKSE
BKSE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BKSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKSE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
BKSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKSE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SLYG vs. BKSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLYGBKSEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.37

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

3.98

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.09

14.29

-1.20

SLYG vs. BKSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the BKSE Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLYG and BKSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLYG vs. BKSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLYG drawdown since its inception was -62.92%, which is greater than BKSE's maximum drawdown of -29.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYG and BKSE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLYGBKSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.92%

-29.08%

-33.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-9.40%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.39%

-26.76%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.18%

-29.08%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

0.00%

-1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.83%

-8.85%

-5.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

2.61%

+0.06%

Volatility

SLYG vs. BKSE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE) at 3.80%. This indicates that SLYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLYGBKSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

3.80%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.96%

11.99%

+0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.81%

17.39%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.51%

21.36%

+0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.73%

22.13%

+0.60%

SLYG vs. BKSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLYG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BKSE's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SLYG vs. BKSE - Dividend Comparison

SLYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than BKSE's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKSE
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF
1.19%1.26%1.55%1.38%1.50%1.17%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
0.65%0.86%1.22%1.18%1.18%0.68%0.71%1.08%1.06%4.74%1.13%5.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SLYG and BKSE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SLYG has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to BKSE (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYG dropped -62.92% vs BKSE's -29.08%.

On 5-year performance, BKSE leads with 9.11% vs 7.13% for SLYG. On fees, BKSE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKSE has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BKSE has performed better with a 9.11% return vs 7.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKSE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYG.

BKSE has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.65% for SLYG.

SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while BKSE tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYG and 0.04% for BKSE.

BKSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLYG and BKSE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer