SLYG vs. AVUV
SLYG (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF) and AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLYG is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while AVUV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. SLYG is passively managed, while AVUV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SLYG returned 5.76%/yr vs 10.98%/yr for AVUV. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SLYG charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AVUV.
Performance
SLYG vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLYG achieves a 16.95% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 19.40% return.
SLYG
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 16.95%
- 6M
- 14.97%
- 1Y
- 28.13%
- 3Y*
- 15.87%
- 5Y*
- 5.76%
- 10Y*
- 10.87%
AVUV
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- YTD
- 19.40%
- 6M
- 18.69%
- 1Y
- 39.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.42%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- —
SLYG vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 16.95% | 5.20% | 9.38% | 17.27% | -21.26% | 22.42% | 19.48% | 7.97% |
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 19.40% | 7.44% | 9.28% | 22.82% | -4.91% | 42.20% | 6.43% | 8.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLYG and AVUV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.92 |
The correlation between SLYG and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
SLYG vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLYG
AVUV
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
SLYG
AVUV
Industrials
SLYG
AVUV
Healthcare
SLYG
AVUV
Financial Services
SLYG
AVUV
Consumer Cyclical
SLYG
AVUV
Real Estate
SLYG
AVUV
Energy
SLYG
AVUV
Communication Services
SLYG
AVUV
Consumer Defensive
SLYG
AVUV
Basic Materials
SLYG
AVUV
Utilities
SLYG
AVUV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLYG vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank
SLYG
AVUV
SLYG vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLYG | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.39 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 4.97 | -1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.86 | 14.75 | -3.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLYG | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 2.26 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.49 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.57 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
SLYG vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLYG drawdown since its inception was -62.15%, which is greater than AVUV's maximum drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYG and AVUV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLYG | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.15% | -49.42% | -12.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.10% | -7.95% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.39% | -28.79% | +1.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.18% | -28.79% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | 0.00% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.55% | -7.95% | -6.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 2.67% | -0.07% |
Volatility
SLYG vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.04%. This indicates that SLYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLYG | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 4.04% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.52% | 11.39% | +1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.56% | 17.52% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.52% | 22.74% | -1.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.74% | 28.29% | -5.55% |
SLYG vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLYG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SLYG vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison
SLYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than AVUV's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.28% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.21% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 0.70% | 0.86% | 1.22% | 1.18% | 1.18% | 0.68% | 0.71% | 1.08% | 1.06% | 4.74% | 1.13% | 5.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, SLYG and AVUV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SLYG has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to AVUV (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYG dropped -62.15% vs AVUV's -49.42%.
On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 10.98% vs 5.76% for SLYG. On fees, SLYG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 10.98% return vs 5.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLYG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVUV.
AVUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.70% for SLYG.
SLYG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYG and 0.25% for AVUV.
AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLYG and AVUV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer