PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLYG vs. AVUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLYG vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLYG achieves a 16.95% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 19.40% return.


SLYG

1D
1.25%
1M
0.60%
YTD
16.95%
6M
14.97%
1Y
28.13%
3Y*
15.87%
5Y*
5.76%
10Y*
10.87%

AVUV

1D
1.22%
1M
1.07%
YTD
19.40%
6M
18.69%
1Y
39.30%
3Y*
20.42%
5Y*
10.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLYG vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
16.95%5.20%9.38%17.27%-21.26%22.42%19.48%7.97%
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
19.40%7.44%9.28%22.82%-4.91%42.20%6.43%8.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SLYG and AVUV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.92

The correlation between SLYG and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

SLYG vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLYG
AVUV

Technology

20.1%
7.0%

Industrials

19.5%
13.9%

Healthcare

14.4%
4.2%

Financial Services

13.9%
25.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
18.0%

Real Estate

6.4%
0.7%

Energy

5.1%
18.2%

Communication Services

2.8%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
4.5%

Basic Materials

2.8%
4.9%

Utilities

1.9%
0.1%

Technology

SLYG
20.1%
AVUV
7.0%

Industrials

SLYG
19.5%
AVUV
13.9%

Healthcare

SLYG
14.4%
AVUV
4.2%

Financial Services

SLYG
13.9%
AVUV
25.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SLYG
10.4%
AVUV
18.0%

Real Estate

SLYG
6.4%
AVUV
0.7%

Energy

SLYG
5.1%
AVUV
18.2%

Communication Services

SLYG
2.8%
AVUV
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

SLYG
2.8%
AVUV
4.5%

Basic Materials

SLYG
2.8%
AVUV
4.9%

Utilities

SLYG
1.9%
AVUV
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLYG vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLYG
SLYG Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SLYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYG Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLYG vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLYGAVUVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.39

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

4.97

-1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.86

14.75

-3.89

SLYG vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLYG and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLYGAVUVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

2.26

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.49

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.57

-0.26

Drawdowns

SLYG vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLYG drawdown since its inception was -62.15%, which is greater than AVUV's maximum drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYG and AVUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLYGAVUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.15%

-49.42%

-12.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-7.95%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.39%

-28.79%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.18%

-28.79%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

0.00%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.55%

-7.95%

-6.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.67%

-0.07%

Volatility

SLYG vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.04%. This indicates that SLYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLYGAVUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

4.04%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.52%

11.39%

+1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.56%

17.52%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.52%

22.74%

-1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.74%

28.29%

-5.55%

SLYG vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLYG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SLYG vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

SLYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than AVUV's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.28%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
0.70%0.86%1.22%1.18%1.18%0.68%0.71%1.08%1.06%4.74%1.13%5.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SLYG and AVUV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SLYG has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to AVUV (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYG dropped -62.15% vs AVUV's -49.42%.

On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 10.98% vs 5.76% for SLYG. On fees, SLYG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 10.98% return vs 5.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLYG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVUV.

AVUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.70% for SLYG.

SLYG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYG and 0.25% for AVUV.

AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLYG and AVUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer