PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLYG vs. AVUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLYG vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SLYG having a 25.05% return and AVUV slightly higher at 25.35%.


SLYG

1D
1.82%
1M
-0.05%
6M
17.84%
YTD
25.05%
1Y
34.81%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
11.12%
ALL TIME*
7.51%

AVUV

1D
1.40%
1M
2.86%
6M
15.44%
YTD
25.35%
1Y
42.62%
3Y*
17.00%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$147.82M$147.76M$156.17M
$11.04M$11.74M$13.56M

SLYG vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
25.05%5.20%9.38%17.27%-21.26%22.42%19.48%6.76%
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
25.35%7.44%9.28%22.82%-4.91%42.20%6.43%8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between SLYG and AVUV is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

0.91

The correlation between SLYG and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

SLYG vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLYG
AVUV

Industrials

19.0%
13.5%

Technology

17.7%
7.4%

Healthcare

17.2%
5.3%

Financial Services

13.9%
27.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
18.5%

Real Estate

6.8%
0.7%

Energy

3.8%
13.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
4.9%

Basic Materials

3.1%
4.8%

Communication Services

2.7%
2.9%

Utilities

1.6%
0.2%

Industrials

SLYG
19.0%
AVUV
13.5%

Technology

SLYG
17.7%
AVUV
7.4%

Healthcare

SLYG
17.2%
AVUV
5.3%

Financial Services

SLYG
13.9%
AVUV
27.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SLYG
11.1%
AVUV
18.5%

Real Estate

SLYG
6.8%
AVUV
0.7%

Energy

SLYG
3.8%
AVUV
13.9%

Consumer Defensive

SLYG
3.3%
AVUV
4.9%

Basic Materials

SLYG
3.1%
AVUV
4.8%

Communication Services

SLYG
2.7%
AVUV
2.9%

Utilities

SLYG
1.6%
AVUV
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLYG vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SLYG
SLYG Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SLYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYG Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYG Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SLYG vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLYGAVUVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.45

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

5.39

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.09

17.01

-3.92

SLYG vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLYG and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLYG vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLYG drawdown since its inception was -62.92%, which is greater than AVUV's maximum drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYG and AVUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLYGAVUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.92%

-49.42%

-13.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-7.95%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.39%

-28.79%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.18%

-28.79%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

0.00%

-1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.83%

-7.78%

-7.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

2.51%

+0.16%

Volatility

SLYG vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 3.08%. This indicates that SLYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLYGAVUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

3.08%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.96%

10.58%

+2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.81%

16.77%

+1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.51%

22.41%

-0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.73%

28.02%

-5.29%

SLYG vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLYG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SLYG vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

SLYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than AVUV's 1.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.23%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
0.65%0.86%1.22%1.18%1.18%0.68%0.71%1.08%1.06%4.74%1.13%5.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLYG and AVUV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLYG has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to AVUV (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYG dropped -62.92% vs AVUV's -49.42%.

On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 13.90% vs 7.13% for SLYG. On fees, SLYG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 13.90% return vs 7.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLYG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVUV.

AVUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.65% for SLYG.

SLYG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYG and 0.25% for AVUV.

AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLYG and AVUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer