PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLXX.L vs. XZBU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLXX.L vs. XZBU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SLXX.L) and Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZBU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SLXX.L

1D
0.21%
1M
2.07%
YTD
-0.09%
6M
0.15%
1Y
4.74%
3Y*
5.83%
5Y*
-0.77%
10Y*
1.80%

XZBU.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLXX.L vs. XZBU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SLXX.L
iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF
-0.09%6.50%1.60%8.54%-18.36%-4.01%3.75%
XZBU.L
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C
34.27%0.67%2.68%2.98%-8.73%-0.87%-2.84%

Correlation

The correlation between SLXX.L and XZBU.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2020

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between SLXX.L and XZBU.L has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLXX.L vs. XZBU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLXX.L
SLXX.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SLXX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLXX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLXX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SLXX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLXX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

XZBU.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLXX.L vs. XZBU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SLXX.L) and Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZBU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLXX.LXZBU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.47

SLXX.L vs. XZBU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLXX.LXZBU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

Drawdowns

SLXX.L vs. XZBU.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLXX.LXZBU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

Volatility

SLXX.L vs. XZBU.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLXX.LXZBU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.08%

SLXX.L vs. XZBU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLXX.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XZBU.L's 0.16% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SLXX.L vs. XZBU.L - Dividend Comparison

SLXX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, while XZBU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLXX.L
iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF
4.93%4.82%4.68%4.06%2.75%2.06%2.12%2.44%2.71%2.73%2.99%3.39%
XZBU.L
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLXX.L and XZBU.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XZBU.L is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XZBU.L is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SLXX.L.

SLXX.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP Liquid Corporates Large Cap Index, while XZBU.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SLXX.L and 0.16% for XZBU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLXX.L and XZBU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer