SLXX.L vs. EQQQ.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SLXX.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE).
SLXX.L and EQQQ.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SLXX.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Markit iBoxx GBP Liquid Corporates Large Cap Index. It was launched on Mar 29, 2004. EQQQ.DE is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Dec 2, 2002. Both SLXX.L and EQQQ.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SLXX.L or EQQQ.DE.
Key characteristics
| SLXX.L | EQQQ.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 1.55% | 21.43% |
| 1Y Return | 10.97% | 29.84% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -3.15% | 12.66% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -1.04% | 21.46% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.25% | 20.44% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.82 | 2.18 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.71 | 2.87 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.33 | 1.40 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.48 | 2.61 |
| Martin Ratio | 7.20 | 8.65 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.52% | 4.05% |
| Daily Std Dev | 6.04% | 16.22% |
| Max Drawdown | -30.27% | -47.04% |
| Current Drawdown | -13.69% | -2.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLXX.L and EQQQ.DE is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SLXX.L vs. EQQQ.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SLXX.L achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than EQQQ.DE's 21.43% return. Over the past 10 years, SLXX.L has underperformed EQQQ.DE with an annualized return of 2.25%, while EQQQ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 20.44% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SLXX.L vs. EQQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLXX.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQQ.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SLXX.L vs. EQQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SLXX.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SLXX.L vs. EQQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
SLXX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, more than EQQQ.DE's 0.40% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLXX.L iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF | 4.56% | 4.06% | 2.75% | 2.06% | 2.12% | 2.44% | 2.71% | 2.73% | 2.99% | 3.39% | 3.41% | 3.74% |
EQQQ.DE Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF | 0.40% | 0.39% | 0.57% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.54% | 0.64% | 0.68% | 0.78% | 0.73% | 0.97% | 0.94% |
Drawdowns
SLXX.L vs. EQQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLXX.L drawdown since its inception was -30.27%, smaller than the maximum EQQQ.DE drawdown of -47.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLXX.L and EQQQ.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SLXX.L vs. EQQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SLXX.L) is 2.08%, while Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that SLXX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.