SLX vs. DVXB
SLX (VanEck Vectors Steel ETF) and DVXB (WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF) are both Materials funds - SLX tracks the NYSE Arca Steel Index while DVXB tracks the Syntax Defined Volatility XLB Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SLX charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for DVXB.
Performance
SLX vs. DVXB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLX achieves a 18.17% return, which is significantly higher than DVXB's 16.74% return.
SLX
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -9.20%
- 6M
- 9.38%
- YTD
- 18.17%
- 1Y
- 47.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.31%
DVXB
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- -4.44%
- 6M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- 16.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLX vs. DVXB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLX VanEck Vectors Steel ETF | 18.17% | 17.66% |
DVXB WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF | 16.74% | -6.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLX and DVXB is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLX vs. DVXB — Risk / Return Rank
SLX
DVXB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SLX vs. DVXB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) and WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF (DVXB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLX | DVXB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.19 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLX vs. DVXB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLX drawdown since its inception was -82.14%, which is greater than DVXB's maximum drawdown of -19.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLX and DVXB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLX | DVXB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.14% | -19.77% | -62.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.71% | -11.55% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.55% | -7.37% | -31.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.79% | — | — |
Volatility
SLX vs. DVXB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLX | DVXB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.01% | 30.41% | -5.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.75% | 30.41% | -2.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.78% | 30.41% | +0.37% |
SLX vs. DVXB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than DVXB's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLX vs. DVXB - Dividend Comparison
SLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, while DVXB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVXB WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLX VanEck Vectors Steel ETF | 1.31% | 1.55% | 3.56% | 2.80% | 4.97% | 7.07% | 1.87% | 3.44% | 6.26% | 2.50% | 1.06% | 5.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLX and DVXB have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SLX is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SLX is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXB.
SLX has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.00% for DVXB.
SLX tracks NYSE Arca Steel Index, while DVXB tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLB Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and WEBs. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for SLX and 0.89% for DVXB.
Find the right allocation for SLX and DVXB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer