SLX vs. CNRG
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG).
SLX and CNRG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SLX is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the NYSE Arca Steel Index. It was launched on Oct 16, 2006. CNRG is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Kensho Clean Power Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2018. Both SLX and CNRG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SLX vs. CNRG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SLX vs. CNRG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLX VanEck Vectors Steel ETF | 9.85% | 47.45% | -17.94% | 31.25% | 14.28% | 27.69% | 20.57% | 12.01% | -13.90% |
CNRG SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF | 2.22% | 50.23% | -14.48% | -11.55% | -7.98% | -15.68% | 138.35% | 63.26% | -2.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLX achieves a 9.85% return, which is significantly higher than CNRG's 2.22% return.
SLX
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -7.28%
- YTD
- 9.85%
- 6M
- 27.70%
- 1Y
- 53.89%
- 3Y*
- 16.55%
- 5Y*
- 15.40%
- 10Y*
- 17.95%
CNRG
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -3.28%
- YTD
- 2.22%
- 6M
- 3.99%
- 1Y
- 82.17%
- 3Y*
- 3.13%
- 5Y*
- -3.01%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SLX vs. CNRG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than CNRG's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SLX vs. CNRG — Risk / Return Rank
SLX
CNRG
SLX vs. CNRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLX | CNRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.99 | 2.13 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.63 | 2.62 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.33 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 4.75 | -1.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.73 | 11.98 | -1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLX | CNRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 2.13 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | -0.09 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.50 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between SLX and CNRG is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SLX vs. CNRG - Dividend Comparison
SLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, more than CNRG's 1.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLX VanEck Vectors Steel ETF | 1.41% | 1.55% | 3.56% | 2.80% | 4.97% | 7.07% | 1.87% | 3.44% | 6.26% | 2.50% | 1.06% | 5.35% |
CNRG SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF | 1.35% | 1.46% | 1.34% | 1.17% | 1.23% | 1.34% | 0.69% | 1.16% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SLX vs. CNRG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLX drawdown since its inception was -82.14%, which is greater than CNRG's maximum drawdown of -68.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLX and CNRG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLX | CNRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.14% | -68.49% | -13.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.35% | -17.73% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.62% | -59.32% | +25.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.02% | -33.53% | +24.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.05% | -32.02% | -7.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.03% | 7.04% | -2.01% |
Volatility
SLX vs. CNRG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) is 8.61%, while SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) has a volatility of 10.59%. This indicates that SLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SLX | CNRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.61% | 10.59% | -1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.95% | 29.57% | -11.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.28% | 38.81% | -11.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.87% | 33.79% | -5.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.36% | 35.77% | -4.41% |