SLVU.TO vs. HXS.TO
SLVU.TO (BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF) and HXS.TO (Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLVU.TO is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Silver Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index ER, while HXS.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLVU.TO returned 7.42%/yr vs 15.90%/yr for HXS.TO. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLVU.TO charges 2.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for HXS.TO.
Performance
SLVU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVU.TO achieves a -32.84% return, which is significantly lower than HXS.TO's 11.99% return. Over the past 10 years, SLVU.TO has underperformed HXS.TO with an annualized return of 7.42%, while HXS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.90% annualized return.
SLVU.TO
- 1D
- -5.36%
- 1M
- -2.10%
- YTD
- -32.84%
- 6M
- -7.57%
- 1Y
- 133.37%
- 3Y*
- 49.77%
- 5Y*
- 12.11%
- 10Y*
- 7.42%
HXS.TO
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 6M
- 10.17%
- 1Y
- 29.00%
- 3Y*
- 23.29%
- 5Y*
- 16.64%
- 10Y*
- 15.90%
SLVU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVU.TO BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF | -32.84% | 349.11% | 20.71% | -16.01% | -10.21% | -34.59% | 55.46% | 16.28% | -26.54% | 1.00% |
HXS.TO Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF | 11.99% | 11.93% | 34.98% | 23.22% | -12.72% | 27.30% | 15.78% | 24.69% | 3.03% | 13.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVU.TO and HXS.TO is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2010 | 0.02 |
The correlation between SLVU.TO and HXS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (10 years) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SLVU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLVU.TO
HXS.TO
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
SLVU.TO
HXS.TO
Basic Materials
SLVU.TO
-
HXS.TO
Communication Services
SLVU.TO
-
HXS.TO
Consumer Cyclical
SLVU.TO
-
HXS.TO
Consumer Defensive
SLVU.TO
-
HXS.TO
Energy
SLVU.TO
-
HXS.TO
Financial Services
SLVU.TO
-
HXS.TO
Healthcare
SLVU.TO
-
HXS.TO
Industrials
SLVU.TO
-
HXS.TO
Technology
SLVU.TO
-
HXS.TO
Utilities
SLVU.TO
-
HXS.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVU.TO vs. HXS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SLVU.TO
HXS.TO
SLVU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF (SLVU.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLVU.TO | HXS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.45 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 3.33 | -1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.33 | 12.62 | -9.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLVU.TO | HXS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 2.46 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 1.11 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | 0.97 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 1.02 | -1.03 |
Drawdowns
SLVU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVU.TO drawdown since its inception was -98.60%, which is greater than HXS.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVU.TO and HXS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVU.TO | HXS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.60% | -27.42% | -71.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.62% | -8.74% | -67.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.62% | -18.98% | -57.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.62% | -22.63% | -53.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.27% | -27.42% | -52.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.63% | -0.27% | -90.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.56% | -3.54% | -79.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.19% | 2.30% | +37.89% |
Volatility
SLVU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Volatility Comparison
BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF (SLVU.TO) has a higher volatility of 34.08% compared to Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) at 3.27%. This indicates that SLVU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HXS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVU.TO | HXS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.08% | 3.27% | +30.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 132.13% | 8.83% | +123.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 118.13% | 11.85% | +106.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.80% | 15.13% | +58.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.52% | 16.53% | +48.99% |
SLVU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVU.TO has a 2.20% expense ratio, which is higher than HXS.TO's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLVU.TO vs. HXS.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither SLVU.TO nor HXS.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SLVU.TO and HXS.TO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HXS.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HXS.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 2.20% for SLVU.TO.
SLVU.TO is categorized as Silver, while HXS.TO is S&P 500. SLVU.TO tracks Solactive Silver Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index ER, while HXS.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 2.20% for SLVU.TO and 0.10% for HXS.TO.
Find the right allocation for SLVU.TO and HXS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer