SLVU.TO vs. HSAV.TO
SLVU.TO (BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF) and HSAV.TO (Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLVU.TO is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Silver Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index ER, while HSAV.TO is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Global X. SLVU.TO is passively managed, while HSAV.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SLVU.TO returned 12.11%/yr vs 3.20%/yr for HSAV.TO. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. SLVU.TO charges 2.20%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for HSAV.TO.
Performance
SLVU.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVU.TO achieves a -32.84% return, which is significantly lower than HSAV.TO's 1.04% return.
SLVU.TO
- 1D
- -5.36%
- 1M
- -2.10%
- YTD
- -32.84%
- 6M
- -7.57%
- 1Y
- 133.37%
- 3Y*
- 49.77%
- 5Y*
- 12.11%
- 10Y*
- 7.42%
HSAV.TO
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 2.70%
- 3Y*
- 3.71%
- 5Y*
- 3.20%
- 10Y*
- —
SLVU.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVU.TO BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF | -32.84% | 349.11% | 20.71% | -16.01% | -10.21% | -34.59% | 58.39% |
HSAV.TO Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF | 1.04% | 2.58% | 4.24% | 5.04% | 2.79% | 0.66% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVU.TO and HSAV.TO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2020 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVU.TO vs. HSAV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SLVU.TO
HSAV.TO
SLVU.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF (SLVU.TO) and Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLVU.TO | HSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.37 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 4.58 | -2.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.33 | 12.46 | -9.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLVU.TO | HSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 1.96 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 1.82 | -1.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 1.72 | -1.73 |
Drawdowns
SLVU.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVU.TO drawdown since its inception was -98.60%, which is greater than HSAV.TO's maximum drawdown of -2.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVU.TO and HSAV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVU.TO | HSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.60% | -2.18% | -96.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.62% | -0.59% | -76.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.62% | -1.06% | -75.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.62% | -2.18% | -74.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.63% | -0.18% | -90.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.56% | -0.19% | -82.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.19% | 0.22% | +39.97% |
Volatility
SLVU.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Volatility Comparison
BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF (SLVU.TO) has a higher volatility of 34.08% compared to Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO) at 0.48%. This indicates that SLVU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSAV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVU.TO | HSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.08% | 0.48% | +33.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 132.13% | 1.05% | +131.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 118.13% | 1.39% | +116.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.80% | 1.77% | +72.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.52% | 1.58% | +63.94% |
SLVU.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVU.TO has a 2.20% expense ratio, which is higher than HSAV.TO's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLVU.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither SLVU.TO nor HSAV.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SLVU.TO and HSAV.TO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HSAV.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HSAV.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 2.20% for SLVU.TO.
SLVU.TO is categorized as Silver, while HSAV.TO is Bank Loan. Their fees differ too: 2.20% for SLVU.TO and 0.18% for HSAV.TO.
Find the right allocation for SLVU.TO and HSAV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer