PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLVRX vs. HFCVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLVRX vs. HFCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R (SLVRX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SLVRX having a 13.29% return and HFCVX slightly higher at 13.70%. Over the past 10 years, SLVRX has outperformed HFCVX with an annualized return of 13.01%, while HFCVX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.15% annualized return.


SLVRX

1D
0.75%
1M
5.23%
YTD
13.29%
6M
16.77%
1Y
36.55%
3Y*
20.42%
5Y*
11.19%
10Y*
13.01%

HFCVX

1D
0.88%
1M
2.10%
YTD
13.70%
6M
14.88%
1Y
26.29%
3Y*
16.75%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
11.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLVRX vs. HFCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLVRX
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R
13.29%27.32%12.24%5.25%-1.30%26.02%5.92%26.26%-12.52%18.96%
HFCVX
Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund
13.70%18.27%9.59%5.81%6.12%29.94%-6.39%20.84%-9.50%19.21%

Correlation

The correlation between SLVRX and HFCVX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2004

0.90

Over the past year, the correlation between SLVRX and HFCVX has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLVRX vs. HFCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLVRX
SLVRX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SLVRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

HFCVX
HFCVX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HFCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HFCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLVRX vs. HFCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R (SLVRX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLVRXHFCVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.51

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.16

7.07

-2.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.04

21.66

-4.62

SLVRX vs. HFCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLVRX Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is comparable to the HFCVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLVRX and HFCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLVRXHFCVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.19

2.91

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.89

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.68

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.41

+0.07

Drawdowns

SLVRX vs. HFCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLVRX drawdown since its inception was -60.20%, smaller than the maximum HFCVX drawdown of -65.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVRX and HFCVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLVRXHFCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.20%

-65.75%

+5.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-3.77%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.91%

-11.32%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.53%

-16.81%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.51%

-39.39%

-2.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.29%

+1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.43%

-8.24%

+0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

1.23%

+0.97%

Volatility

SLVRX vs. HFCVX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R (SLVRX) has a higher volatility of 3.25% compared to Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX) at 2.79%. This indicates that SLVRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLVRXHFCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

2.79%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.83%

6.85%

+1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.77%

9.16%

+2.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.89%

13.26%

+2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.69%

16.46%

+2.23%

SLVRX vs. HFCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLVRX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than HFCVX's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLVRX vs. HFCVX - Dividend Comparison

SLVRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.50%, more than HFCVX's 6.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFCVX
Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund
6.50%7.39%4.56%3.57%10.33%4.81%2.58%6.58%17.16%14.97%2.26%2.57%
SLVRX
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R
7.50%8.50%3.27%3.42%1.15%5.83%7.46%6.83%4.60%3.92%8.22%4.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLVRX and HFCVX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLVRX has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to HFCVX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVRX dropped -60.20% vs HFCVX's -65.75%.

SLVRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLVRX and HFCVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer