SLVRX vs. NOBL
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R (SLVRX) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL).
SLVRX is managed by Columbia Threadneedle. It was launched on Apr 30, 2003. NOBL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SLVRX or NOBL.
Correlation
The correlation between SLVRX and NOBL is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SLVRX vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SLVRX:
0.84
NOBL:
0.85
SLVRX:
1.17
NOBL:
1.23
SLVRX:
1.16
NOBL:
1.15
SLVRX:
1.01
NOBL:
1.11
SLVRX:
4.24
NOBL:
3.36
SLVRX:
2.38%
NOBL:
2.58%
SLVRX:
12.09%
NOBL:
10.22%
SLVRX:
-60.30%
NOBL:
-35.43%
SLVRX:
-8.38%
NOBL:
-6.54%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVRX achieves a 9.37% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 8.04% return. Over the past 10 years, SLVRX has underperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 8.42%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively higher 9.40% annualized return.
SLVRX
9.37%
-7.47%
0.03%
9.74%
8.74%
8.42%
NOBL
8.04%
-5.22%
5.48%
8.66%
8.23%
9.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SLVRX vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVRX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SLVRX vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R (SLVRX) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SLVRX vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
SLVRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVRX Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R | 0.00% | 1.79% | 1.03% | 1.67% | 2.19% | 1.55% | 1.39% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.23% | 0.58% | 0.98% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.03% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% | 1.60% | 0.30% |
Drawdowns
SLVRX vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVRX drawdown since its inception was -60.30%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVRX and NOBL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SLVRX vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R (SLVRX) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.19%. This indicates that SLVRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.