SLVRX vs. NOBL

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SLVRX (Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both funds - SLVRX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Columbia, while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Over the past 10 years, SLVRX returned 13.09%/yr vs 9.90%/yr for NOBL. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SLVRX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.

Performance

SLVRX vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R (SLVRX) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLVRX achieves a 13.27% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 5.77% return. Over the past 10 years, SLVRX has outperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 13.09%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.90% annualized return.

SLVRX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.14%
• YTD: 13.27%
• 6M: 12.88%
• 1Y: 36.63%
• 3Y*: 19.21%
• 5Y*: 12.52%
• 10Y*: 13.09%

NOBL

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 1.59%
• YTD: 5.77%
• 6M: 4.96%
• 1Y: 13.10%
• 3Y*: 8.26%
• 5Y*: 6.14%
• 10Y*: 9.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLVRX vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SLVRX Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R	13.27%	27.32%	12.24%	5.25%	-1.30%	26.02%	5.92%	26.26%	-12.52%	18.96%
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	5.77%	6.84%	6.72%	8.09%	-6.52%	25.46%	8.35%	27.39%	-3.26%	21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SLVRX and NOBL is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013	0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between SLVRX and NOBL has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

SLVRX vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLVRX

SLVRX Risk / Return Rank: 89
SLVRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
SLVRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
SLVRX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
SLVRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
SLVRX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

NOBL

NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 31
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 29
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLVRX vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R (SLVRX) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SLVRX	NOBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.00	1.14	+1.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.17	1.74	+2.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.20	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.06	1.44	+2.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.55	3.67	+12.88

SLVRX vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLVRX Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is higher than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLVRX and NOBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SLVRX vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLVRX drawdown since its inception was -60.20%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVRX and NOBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLVRX	NOBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.20%	-35.43%	-24.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.03%	-9.11%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.91%	-15.36%	+0.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.53%	-17.92%	-0.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.51%	-35.43%	-6.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.34%	-3.94%	+2.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.42%	-3.48%	-3.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.21%	3.58%	-1.37%

Volatility

SLVRX vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R (SLVRX) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.31%. This indicates that SLVRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLVRX	NOBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.16%	3.31%	+0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.31%	8.20%	+1.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.20%	11.53%	+0.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.91%	14.38%	+1.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.71%	16.63%	+2.08%

SLVRX vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLVRX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLVRX vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

SLVRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.50%, more than NOBL's 2.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	2.07%	2.14%	2.05%	2.09%	1.94%	1.89%	2.14%	1.89%	2.37%	1.74%	2.13%	2.02%
SLVRX Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R	7.50%	8.50%	3.27%	3.42%	1.15%	5.83%	7.46%	6.83%	4.60%	3.92%	8.22%	4.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLVRX and NOBL in my portfolio?

SLVRX and NOBL have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SLVRX or NOBL?

SLVRX has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to NOBL (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVRX dropped -60.20% vs NOBL's -35.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SLVRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.