HFCVX vs. DDVCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX) and Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX).
HFCVX is managed by Hennessy. It was launched on Nov 1, 1996. DDVCX is an actively managed fund by Nomura. It was launched on Apr 30, 2002.
Performance
HFCVX vs. DDVCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HFCVX vs. DDVCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFCVX Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund | 8.31% | 18.27% | 9.59% | 5.81% | 6.12% | 29.94% | -6.39% | 20.84% | -9.50% | 19.21% |
DDVCX Nomura Value Fund Class C | 0.79% | 9.95% | 5.68% | 1.06% | -4.57% | 20.87% | -0.63% | 19.33% | -3.92% | 12.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HFCVX achieves a 8.31% return, which is significantly higher than DDVCX's 0.79% return. Over the past 10 years, HFCVX has outperformed DDVCX with an annualized return of 10.76%, while DDVCX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.92% annualized return.
HFCVX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- 8.31%
- 6M
- 12.62%
- 1Y
- 17.31%
- 3Y*
- 14.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
DDVCX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.81%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 3.79%
- 1Y
- 11.08%
- 3Y*
- 7.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- 6.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HFCVX vs. DDVCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFCVX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is lower than DDVCX's 1.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HFCVX vs. DDVCX — Risk / Return Rank
HFCVX
DDVCX
HFCVX vs. DDVCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX) and Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HFCVX | DDVCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.46 | 0.75 | +0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.97 | 1.13 | +0.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.16 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 0.86 | +0.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.83 | 3.35 | +3.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HFCVX | DDVCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 0.75 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.32 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.41 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.37 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between HFCVX and DDVCX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HFCVX vs. DDVCX - Dividend Comparison
HFCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, less than DDVCX's 26.23% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFCVX Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund | 6.83% | 7.39% | 4.56% | 3.57% | 10.33% | 4.81% | 2.58% | 6.58% | 17.16% | 14.97% | 2.26% | 2.57% |
DDVCX Nomura Value Fund Class C | 26.23% | 26.55% | 30.88% | 10.78% | 9.46% | 23.96% | 1.92% | 4.13% | 5.29% | 3.08% | 1.57% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
HFCVX vs. DDVCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFCVX drawdown since its inception was -65.75%, which is greater than DDVCX's maximum drawdown of -54.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFCVX and DDVCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFCVX | DDVCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.75% | -54.29% | -11.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.00% | -11.60% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.81% | -18.71% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.39% | -37.60% | -1.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.27% | -8.59% | +6.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.28% | -9.07% | +0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 3.11% | -0.51% |
Volatility
HFCVX vs. DDVCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX) is 2.92%, while Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that HFCVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DDVCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HFCVX | DDVCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 3.92% | -1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.80% | 8.77% | -1.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.75% | 16.13% | -3.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.27% | 14.49% | -1.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.48% | 17.04% | -0.56% |