SLVRX vs. SIVR
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R (SLVRX) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR).
SLVRX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Apr 30, 2003. SIVR is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). It was launched on Jul 24, 2009.
Performance
SLVRX vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SLVRX vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVRX Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R | 0.13% | 27.32% | 12.24% | 5.25% | -1.30% | 26.02% | 5.92% | 26.26% | -12.52% | 18.96% |
SIVR Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF | 5.87% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | -12.33% | 47.52% | 15.17% | -8.96% | 5.97% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVRX achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than SIVR's 5.87% return. Over the past 10 years, SLVRX has underperformed SIVR with an annualized return of 12.07%, while SIVR has yielded a comparatively higher 17.11% annualized return.
SLVRX
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -8.87%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 24.03%
- 3Y*
- 15.22%
- 5Y*
- 10.31%
- 10Y*
- 12.07%
SIVR
- 1D
- 7.36%
- 1M
- -19.77%
- YTD
- 5.87%
- 6M
- 60.99%
- 1Y
- 120.27%
- 3Y*
- 45.79%
- 5Y*
- 24.36%
- 10Y*
- 17.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SLVRX vs. SIVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVRX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SIVR's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SLVRX vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank
SLVRX
SIVR
SLVRX vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R (SLVRX) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLVRX | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.48 | 2.12 | -0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.00 | 2.21 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.39 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 2.84 | -0.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.01 | 8.85 | -0.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLVRX | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 2.12 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.69 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.55 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.33 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVRX and SIVR is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SLVRX vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison
SLVRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.48%, while SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVRX Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R | 8.48% | 8.50% | 3.27% | 3.42% | 1.15% | 5.83% | 7.46% | 6.83% | 4.60% | 3.92% | 8.22% | 4.27% |
SIVR Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SLVRX vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVRX drawdown since its inception was -60.20%, smaller than the maximum SIVR drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVRX and SIVR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVRX | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.20% | -75.85% | +15.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.41% | -42.42% | +30.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.53% | -42.42% | +23.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.51% | -42.42% | +0.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.03% | -35.41% | +26.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -48.00% | +40.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 13.61% | -10.72% |
Volatility
SLVRX vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R (SLVRX) is 3.73%, while Aberdeen Standard Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a volatility of 18.93%. This indicates that SLVRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SLVRX | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 18.93% | -15.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.04% | 57.26% | -48.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.96% | 57.02% | -40.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.86% | 35.31% | -19.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 31.39% | -12.71% |