SLVRX vs. SIVR
SLVRX (Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R) and SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) are both funds - SLVRX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Columbia, while SIVR is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). Over the past 10 years, SLVRX returned 13.09%/yr vs 13.54%/yr for SIVR. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLVRX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SIVR.
Performance
SLVRX vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVRX achieves a 13.27% return, which is significantly higher than SIVR's -8.44% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SLVRX having a 13.09% annualized return and SIVR not far ahead at 13.54%.
SLVRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- YTD
- 13.27%
- 6M
- 12.88%
- 1Y
- 36.63%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 12.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.09%
SIVR
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -13.77%
- YTD
- -8.44%
- 6M
- -5.58%
- 1Y
- 80.34%
- 3Y*
- 42.28%
- 5Y*
- 19.98%
- 10Y*
- 13.54%
SLVRX vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVRX Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R | 13.27% | 27.32% | 12.24% | 5.25% | -1.30% | 26.02% | 5.92% | 26.26% | -12.52% | 18.96% |
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | -8.44% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | -12.33% | 47.52% | 15.17% | -8.96% | 5.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVRX and SIVR is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2009 | 0.23 |
The correlation between SLVRX and SIVR shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (10 years) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVRX vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank
SLVRX
SIVR
SLVRX vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R (SLVRX) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLVRX | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.28 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.06 | 1.78 | +2.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.55 | 3.72 | +12.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLVRX vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVRX drawdown since its inception was -60.20%, smaller than the maximum SIVR drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVRX and SIVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVRX | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.20% | -75.85% | +15.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | -45.33% | +36.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.91% | -45.33% | +30.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.53% | -45.33% | +26.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.51% | -45.33% | +3.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -44.14% | +42.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.42% | -47.83% | +40.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 21.67% | -19.46% |
Volatility
SLVRX vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R (SLVRX) is 4.16%, while abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a volatility of 13.63%. This indicates that SLVRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVRX | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 13.63% | -9.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.31% | 59.02% | -49.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.20% | 60.12% | -47.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.91% | 36.53% | -20.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.71% | 32.08% | -13.37% |
SLVRX vs. SIVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVRX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SIVR's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLVRX vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison
SLVRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.50%, while SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLVRX Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R | 7.50% | 8.50% | 3.27% | 3.42% | 1.15% | 5.83% | 7.46% | 6.83% | 4.60% | 3.92% | 8.22% | 4.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLVRX and SIVR have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIVR has higher volatility (13.63%) compared to SLVRX (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVRX dropped -60.20% vs SIVR's -75.85%.
SLVRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLVRX and SIVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer