PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLVRX vs. SIVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLVRX vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R (SLVRX) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLVRX achieves a 13.27% return, which is significantly higher than SIVR's -8.44% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SLVRX having a 13.09% annualized return and SIVR not far ahead at 13.54%.


SLVRX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.14%
YTD
13.27%
6M
12.88%
1Y
36.63%
3Y*
19.21%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*
13.09%

SIVR

1D
-0.99%
1M
-13.77%
YTD
-8.44%
6M
-5.58%
1Y
80.34%
3Y*
42.28%
5Y*
19.98%
10Y*
13.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLVRX vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLVRX
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R
13.27%27.32%12.24%5.25%-1.30%26.02%5.92%26.26%-12.52%18.96%
SIVR
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
-8.44%145.34%21.08%-0.91%2.59%-12.33%47.52%15.17%-8.96%5.97%

Correlation

The correlation between SLVRX and SIVR is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2009

0.23

The correlation between SLVRX and SIVR shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (10 years) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLVRX vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLVRX
SLVRX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SLVRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

SIVR
SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLVRX vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R (SLVRX) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLVRXSIVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.28

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.06

1.78

+2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.55

3.72

+12.84

SLVRX vs. SIVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLVRX Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is higher than the SIVR Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLVRX and SIVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLVRX vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLVRX drawdown since its inception was -60.20%, smaller than the maximum SIVR drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVRX and SIVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLVRXSIVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.20%

-75.85%

+15.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-45.33%

+36.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.91%

-45.33%

+30.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.53%

-45.33%

+26.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.51%

-45.33%

+3.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-44.14%

+42.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.42%

-47.83%

+40.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

21.67%

-19.46%

Volatility

SLVRX vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R (SLVRX) is 4.16%, while abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a volatility of 13.63%. This indicates that SLVRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLVRXSIVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

13.63%

-9.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

59.02%

-49.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.20%

60.12%

-47.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.91%

36.53%

-20.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.71%

32.08%

-13.37%

SLVRX vs. SIVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLVRX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SIVR's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLVRX vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison

SLVRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.50%, while SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SIVR
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLVRX
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Class R
7.50%8.50%3.27%3.42%1.15%5.83%7.46%6.83%4.60%3.92%8.22%4.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLVRX and SIVR have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIVR has higher volatility (13.63%) compared to SLVRX (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVRX dropped -60.20% vs SIVR's -75.85%.

SLVRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLVRX and SIVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer