SLVR vs. URA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SLVR (Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF) and URA (Global X Uranium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLVR is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Silver Miners™ Index, while URA is a Uranium fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SLVR returned 74.96% vs 27.21% for URA. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SLVR charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for URA.

Performance

SLVR vs. URA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLVR achieves a -10.65% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 6.67% return.

SLVR

• 1D: -6.24%
• 1M: -15.79%
• YTD: -10.65%
• 6M: -13.23%
• 1Y: 74.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

URA

• 1D: -2.61%
• 1M: -6.90%
• YTD: 6.67%
• 6M: 2.57%
• 1Y: 27.21%
• 3Y*: 34.68%
• 5Y*: 20.40%
• 10Y*: 16.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLVR vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SLVR Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF	-10.65%	171.53%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	6.67%	64.60%

Correlation

The correlation between SLVR and URA is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025	0.51

The correlation between SLVR and URA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SLVR vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLVR

SLVR Risk / Return Rank: 34
SLVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
SLVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
SLVR Omega Ratio Rank: 35
SLVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
SLVR Martin Ratio Rank: 31

URA

URA Risk / Return Rank: 19
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 19
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLVR vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SLVR	URA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	0.53	+0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	1.09	+0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.13	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.81	0.87	+0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.32	1.87	+2.44

SLVR vs. URA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLVR Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the URA Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLVR and URA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SLVR vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLVR drawdown since its inception was -41.59%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVR and URA.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLVR	URA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.59%	-93.54%	+51.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.59%	-31.48%	-10.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-37.81%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.90%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.19%	-48.27%	+8.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.16%	-74.90%	+64.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.43%	14.58%	+2.85%

Volatility

SLVR vs. URA - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) has a higher volatility of 21.36% compared to Global X Uranium ETF (URA) at 17.86%. This indicates that SLVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLVR	URA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.36%	17.86%	+3.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.78%	39.53%	+14.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.17%	51.33%	+12.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.98%	43.92%	+15.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.98%	37.95%	+21.03%

SLVR vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLVR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLVR vs. URA - Dividend Comparison

SLVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, less than URA's 4.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SLVR Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF	4.12%	3.68%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	4.57%	4.88%	2.86%	6.07%	0.76%	5.84%	1.69%	1.66%	0.44%	2.03%	7.28%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLVR and URA in my portfolio?

SLVR and URA have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SLVR or URA?

SLVR has higher volatility (21.36%) compared to URA (17.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVR dropped -41.59% vs URA's -93.54%.

Which ETF is better, SLVR or URA?

On 1-year performance, SLVR leads with 74.96% vs 27.21% for URA. On fees, SLVR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, URA has been the lower-risk option at 17.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SLVR or URA?

Over the 1-year period, SLVR has performed better with a 74.96% return vs 27.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SLVR or URA?

SLVR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SLVR or URA?

URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 4.12% for SLVR.

What is the main difference between SLVR and URA?

SLVR is categorized as Silver, while URA is Uranium. SLVR tracks Nasdaq Sprott Silver Miners™ Index, while URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SLVR and 0.69% for URA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SLVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.