SLVR vs. METL
SLVR (Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF) and METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLVR is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Silver Miners™ Index, while METL is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Sprott. SLVR is passively managed, while METL is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SLVR charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for METL.
Performance
SLVR vs. METL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVR achieves a 6.80% return, which is significantly lower than METL's 18.34% return.
SLVR
- 1D
- -5.47%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 6.80%
- 6M
- 18.93%
- 1Y
- 118.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METL
- 1D
- -3.81%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 18.34%
- 6M
- 25.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLVR vs. METL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLVR Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF | 6.80% | 57.34% |
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 18.34% | 27.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVR and METL is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVR vs. METL — Risk / Return Rank
SLVR
METL
SLVR vs. METL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) and Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLVR | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.93 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.25 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.66 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLVR | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.02 | 1.72 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
SLVR vs. METL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVR drawdown since its inception was -38.60%, which is greater than METL's maximum drawdown of -27.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVR and METL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVR | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.60% | -27.39% | -11.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.51% | -10.27% | -18.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.24% | -8.11% | -1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.47% | — | — |
Volatility
SLVR vs. METL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVR | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.02% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.64% | 43.94% | +17.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.85% | 43.94% | +13.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.85% | 43.94% | +13.91% |
SLVR vs. METL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than METL's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLVR vs. METL - Dividend Comparison
SLVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, more than METL's 0.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 0.84% | 0.99% |
SLVR Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF | 3.45% | 3.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLVR and METL have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SLVR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SLVR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.
SLVR has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 0.84% for METL.
SLVR is categorized as Silver, while METL is Commodity Producers Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SLVR and 0.89% for METL.
Find the right allocation for SLVR and METL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer