SLVR vs. GBUG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) and Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG).

SLVR and GBUG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SLVR is a passively managed fund by Sprott that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Silver Miners™ Index. It was launched on Jan 14, 2025. GBUG is an actively managed fund by Sprott. It was launched on Feb 19, 2025.

Performance

SLVR vs. GBUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) and Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SLVR vs. GBUG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SLVR Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF	9.09%	143.22%
GBUG Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF	9.41%	119.00%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SLVR having a 9.09% return and GBUG slightly higher at 9.41%.

SLVR

• 1D: 2.86%
• 1M: -25.38%
• YTD: 9.09%
• 6M: 41.25%
• 1Y: 168.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GBUG

• 1D: 5.19%
• 1M: -17.50%
• YTD: 9.41%
• 6M: 28.09%
• 1Y: 124.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLVR vs. GBUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLVR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than GBUG's 0.89% expense ratio.

GBUG

Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF

SLVR

Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF

Return for Risk

SLVR vs. GBUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLVR

SLVR Risk / Return Rank: 93
SLVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
SLVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
SLVR Omega Ratio Rank: 90
SLVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
SLVR Martin Ratio Rank: 93

GBUG

GBUG Risk / Return Rank: 93
GBUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
GBUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
GBUG Omega Ratio Rank: 91
GBUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
GBUG Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLVR vs. GBUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) and Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SLVR	GBUG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.77	2.58	+0.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.78	2.69	+0.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.40	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.25	3.84	+0.40
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.50	13.76	+0.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SLVR vs. GBUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLVR Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is comparable to the GBUG Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLVR and GBUG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SLVR	GBUG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.77	2.58	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.51	2.53	-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between SLVR and GBUG is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

SLVR vs. GBUG - Dividend Comparison

SLVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than GBUG's 1.42% yield.

	TTM	2025
SLVR Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF	3.38%	3.68%
GBUG Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF	1.42%	1.56%

Drawdowns

SLVR vs. GBUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLVR drawdown since its inception was -38.60%, which is greater than GBUG's maximum drawdown of -32.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVR and GBUG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLVR	GBUG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.60%	-32.10%	-6.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.60%	-32.10%	-6.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.98%	-17.83%	-9.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.89%	-5.57%	-1.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.31%	8.97%	+2.34%

Volatility

SLVR vs. GBUG - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) has a higher volatility of 21.83% compared to Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) at 18.82%. This indicates that SLVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLVR	GBUG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.83%	18.82%	+3.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.68%	40.68%	+13.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.28%	48.64%	+12.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.27%	47.55%	+10.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.27%	47.55%	+10.72%