SLVR.DE vs. CAUT.DE
SLVR.DE (WisdomTree Silver) and CAUT.DE (Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - SLVR.DE is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex, while CAUT.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive China Electric Vehicle and Battery. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SLVR.DE returned 45.36%/yr vs 1.53%/yr for CAUT.DE. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLVR.DE charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for CAUT.DE.
Performance
SLVR.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVR.DE achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly higher than CAUT.DE's 0.51% return.
SLVR.DE
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 17.62%
- 1Y
- 93.81%
- 3Y*
- 45.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAUT.DE
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- -12.56%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 33.26%
- 3Y*
- 1.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLVR.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVR.DE WisdomTree Silver | 1.99% | 147.57% | 21.38% | -4.72% | -10.71% |
CAUT.DE Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.51% | 27.42% | 9.31% | -35.25% | -1.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVR.DE and CAUT.DE is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2022 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVR.DE vs. CAUT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SLVR.DE
CAUT.DE
SLVR.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.DE) and Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLVR.DE | CAUT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.21 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 2.08 | +0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.37 | 4.42 | +2.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLVR.DE | CAUT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 1.18 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | -0.27 | +0.95 |
Drawdowns
SLVR.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVR.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.33%, smaller than the maximum CAUT.DE drawdown of -69.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVR.DE and CAUT.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVR.DE | CAUT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.33% | -69.24% | +37.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.51% | -15.89% | -14.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.51% | -42.32% | +11.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.02% | -43.96% | +19.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.66% | -45.53% | +32.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.69% | 7.51% | +5.18% |
Volatility
SLVR.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.DE) has a higher volatility of 17.06% compared to Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE) at 6.05%. This indicates that SLVR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAUT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVR.DE | CAUT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.06% | 6.05% | +11.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.25% | 18.36% | +22.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.34% | 28.22% | +22.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.29% | 33.13% | +5.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.29% | 33.13% | +5.16% |
SLVR.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVR.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CAUT.DE's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLVR.DE vs. CAUT.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SLVR.DE nor CAUT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SLVR.DE and CAUT.DE have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SLVR.DE is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SLVR.DE is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for CAUT.DE.
SLVR.DE is categorized as Silver, while CAUT.DE is Technology Equities. SLVR.DE tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex, while CAUT.DE tracks Solactive China Electric Vehicle and Battery. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SLVR.DE and 0.68% for CAUT.DE.
Find the right allocation for SLVR.DE and CAUT.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer