SLVR.DE vs. FNGU
SLVR.DE (WisdomTree Silver) and FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs) are both exchange-traded funds - SLVR.DE is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex, while FNGU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SLVR.DE returned 97.33% vs 61.39% for FNGU. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLVR.DE charges 0.49%/yr vs 2.60%/yr for FNGU.
Performance
SLVR.DE vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SLVR.DE is traded in EUR, while FNGU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FNGU values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVR.DE achieves a 1.85% return, which is significantly lower than FNGU's 37.82% return.
SLVR.DE
- 1D
- -4.25%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 1.85%
- 6M
- 15.39%
- 1Y
- 97.33%
- 3Y*
- 45.38%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNGU
- 1D
- -3.54%
- 1M
- 34.91%
- YTD
- 37.82%
- 6M
- 16.85%
- 1Y
- 61.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLVR.DE vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLVR.DE WisdomTree Silver | 1.85% | 117.71% |
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs | 37.82% | -6.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVR.DE and FNGU is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVR.DE vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank
SLVR.DE
FNGU
SLVR.DE vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.DE) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLVR.DE | FNGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.20 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 1.04 | +2.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.70 | 2.47 | +5.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLVR.DE | FNGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 1.08 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.27 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
SLVR.DE vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVR.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.33%, smaller than the maximum FNGU drawdown of -62.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVR.DE and FNGU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVR.DE | FNGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.33% | -62.46% | +31.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.51% | -59.05% | +28.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.12% | -4.53% | -19.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.65% | -23.99% | +11.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.60% | 24.89% | -12.29% |
Volatility
SLVR.DE vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.DE) has a higher volatility of 18.78% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) at 15.58%. This indicates that SLVR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVR.DE | FNGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.78% | 15.58% | +3.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.56% | 43.74% | -2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.34% | 56.94% | -6.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.31% | 79.31% | -41.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.31% | 79.31% | -41.00% |
SLVR.DE vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVR.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGU's 2.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLVR.DE vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison
Neither SLVR.DE nor FNGU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SLVR.DE and FNGU have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SLVR.DE is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SLVR.DE is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 2.60% for FNGU.
SLVR.DE is categorized as Silver, while FNGU is Leveraged Equities. SLVR.DE tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex, while FNGU tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Bank of Montreal. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SLVR.DE and 2.60% for FNGU.
Find the right allocation for SLVR.DE and FNGU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer