SLVR.DE vs. FNGU
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.DE) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU).
SLVR.DE and FNGU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SLVR.DE is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. It was launched on May 6, 2022. FNGU is a passively managed fund by Bank of Montreal that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG (TR) (300%). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018. Both SLVR.DE and FNGU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SLVR.DE vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SLVR.DE vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLVR.DE WisdomTree Silver | 9.68% | 117.71% |
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN | -34.44% | -6.82% |
Different Trading Currencies
SLVR.DE is traded in EUR, while FNGU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FNGU values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVR.DE achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly higher than FNGU's -34.44% return.
SLVR.DE
- 1D
- 7.57%
- 1M
- -16.87%
- YTD
- 9.68%
- 6M
- 35.48%
- 1Y
- 135.59%
- 3Y*
- 44.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNGU
- 1D
- 4.24%
- 1M
- -13.12%
- YTD
- -34.44%
- 6M
- -43.25%
- 1Y
- 10.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SLVR.DE vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVR.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SLVR.DE vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank
SLVR.DE
FNGU
SLVR.DE vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.DE) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLVR.DE | FNGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.78 | 0.13 | +2.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.95 | 0.77 | +2.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.10 | +0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.49 | 0.25 | +4.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.32 | 0.64 | +13.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLVR.DE | FNGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78 | 0.13 | +2.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | -0.44 | +1.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVR.DE and FNGU is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SLVR.DE vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison
Neither SLVR.DE nor FNGU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SLVR.DE vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVR.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.33%, smaller than the maximum FNGU drawdown of -62.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVR.DE and FNGU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVR.DE | FNGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.33% | -60.84% | +29.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.51% | -59.55% | +29.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.29% | -51.94% | +33.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.33% | -21.87% | +9.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.57% | 22.51% | -12.94% |
Volatility
SLVR.DE vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.DE) is 19.94%, while MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) has a volatility of 22.97%. This indicates that SLVR.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SLVR.DE | FNGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.94% | 22.97% | -3.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.45% | 44.74% | -2.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.52% | 78.85% | -30.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.53% | 81.81% | -44.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.53% | 81.81% | -44.28% |