SLVP vs. XAR
SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) and XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLVP is a Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index, while XAR is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLVP returned 12.67%/yr vs 18.45%/yr for XAR. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLVP charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XAR.
Performance
SLVP vs. XAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVP achieves a -5.37% return, which is significantly lower than XAR's 16.10% return. Over the past 10 years, SLVP has underperformed XAR with an annualized return of 12.67%, while XAR has yielded a comparatively higher 18.45% annualized return.
SLVP
- 1D
- 3.38%
- 1M
- -11.10%
- YTD
- -5.37%
- 6M
- -0.60%
- 1Y
- 81.81%
- 3Y*
- 48.97%
- 5Y*
- 14.15%
- 10Y*
- 12.67%
XAR
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 16.10%
- 6M
- 18.39%
- 1Y
- 42.07%
- 3Y*
- 33.32%
- 5Y*
- 16.58%
- 10Y*
- 18.45%
SLVP vs. XAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | -5.37% | 202.84% | 14.47% | -2.31% | -18.06% | -23.53% | 56.45% | 37.71% | -22.10% | 4.53% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 16.10% | 46.15% | 23.32% | 23.79% | -5.02% | 2.31% | 6.18% | 39.33% | -4.58% | 33.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVP and XAR is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012 | 0.21 |
The correlation between SLVP and XAR shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SLVP vs. XAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLVP
XAR
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
SLVP
XAR
-
Financial Services
SLVP
XAR
-
Communication Services
SLVP
-
XAR
-
Consumer Cyclical
SLVP
-
XAR
-
Consumer Defensive
SLVP
-
XAR
-
Energy
SLVP
-
XAR
-
Healthcare
SLVP
-
XAR
-
Industrials
SLVP
-
XAR
Real Estate
SLVP
-
XAR
-
Technology
SLVP
-
XAR
Utilities
SLVP
-
XAR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVP vs. XAR — Risk / Return Rank
SLVP
XAR
SLVP vs. XAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) and SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLVP | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.25 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 2.43 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.86 | 6.81 | -0.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLVP vs. XAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVP drawdown since its inception was -80.47%, which is greater than XAR's maximum drawdown of -46.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVP and XAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVP | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.47% | -46.37% | -34.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.06% | -17.22% | -20.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.06% | -19.73% | -18.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.84% | -32.40% | -20.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.03% | -46.37% | -15.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.74% | -4.32% | -27.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.78% | -6.78% | -40.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.31% | 6.13% | +8.18% |
Volatility
SLVP vs. XAR - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) has a higher volatility of 19.61% compared to SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) at 11.46%. This indicates that SLVP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVP | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.61% | 11.46% | +8.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.17% | 23.56% | +21.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.53% | 27.85% | +26.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.15% | 23.66% | +19.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.45% | 24.74% | +17.71% |
SLVP vs. XAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVP has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XAR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLVP vs. XAR - Dividend Comparison
SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than XAR's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 1.88% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLVP and XAR have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLVP has higher volatility (19.61%) compared to XAR (11.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVP dropped -80.47% vs XAR's -46.37%.
On 10-year performance, XAR leads with 18.45% vs 12.67% for SLVP. On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XAR has been the lower-risk option at 11.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XAR has performed better with a 18.45% return vs 12.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SLVP.
SLVP has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 0.31% for XAR.
SLVP is categorized as Silver, while XAR is Aerospace & Defense. SLVP tracks MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index, while XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SLVP and 0.35% for XAR.
SLVP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLVP and XAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer