SLVP vs. GREK
SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) and GREK (Global X MSCI Greece ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLVP is a Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index, while GREK is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Greece Select 25-50. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLVP returned 12.67%/yr vs 16.01%/yr for GREK. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLVP charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for GREK.
Performance
SLVP vs. GREK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVP achieves a -5.37% return, which is significantly lower than GREK's 15.45% return. Over the past 10 years, SLVP has underperformed GREK with an annualized return of 12.67%, while GREK has yielded a comparatively higher 16.01% annualized return.
SLVP
- 1D
- 3.38%
- 1M
- -21.72%
- YTD
- -5.37%
- 6M
- -0.60%
- 1Y
- 83.53%
- 3Y*
- 48.97%
- 5Y*
- 14.15%
- 10Y*
- 12.67%
GREK
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 5.63%
- YTD
- 15.45%
- 6M
- 15.54%
- 1Y
- 38.63%
- 3Y*
- 32.67%
- 5Y*
- 24.30%
- 10Y*
- 16.01%
SLVP vs. GREK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | -5.37% | 202.84% | 14.47% | -2.31% | -18.06% | -23.53% | 56.45% | 37.71% | -22.10% | 4.53% |
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF | 15.45% | 76.11% | 9.53% | 42.72% | 3.64% | 6.14% | -13.89% | 50.20% | -31.25% | 34.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVP and GREK is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012 | 0.22 |
The correlation between SLVP and GREK shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SLVP vs. GREK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLVP
GREK
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
SLVP
GREK
Communication Services
SLVP
-
GREK
Consumer Cyclical
SLVP
-
GREK
Consumer Defensive
SLVP
-
GREK
Energy
SLVP
-
GREK
Financial Services
SLVP
-
GREK
Healthcare
SLVP
-
GREK
-
Industrials
SLVP
-
GREK
Real Estate
SLVP
-
GREK
Technology
SLVP
-
GREK
-
Utilities
SLVP
-
GREK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVP vs. GREK — Risk / Return Rank
SLVP
GREK
SLVP vs. GREK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) and Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLVP | GREK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.28 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 1.82 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.86 | 5.62 | +0.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLVP vs. GREK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVP drawdown since its inception was -80.47%, roughly equal to the maximum GREK drawdown of -79.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVP and GREK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVP | GREK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.47% | -79.50% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.06% | -21.32% | -16.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.06% | -22.63% | -15.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.26% | -30.46% | -23.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.03% | -57.04% | -4.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.74% | -1.44% | -30.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.78% | -45.25% | -1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.31% | 6.90% | +7.41% |
Volatility
SLVP vs. GREK - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) has a higher volatility of 19.61% compared to Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) at 8.69%. This indicates that SLVP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GREK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVP | GREK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.61% | 8.69% | +10.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.17% | 20.65% | +24.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.53% | 24.35% | +30.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.15% | 24.44% | +18.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.45% | 29.71% | +12.74% |
SLVP vs. GREK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVP has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GREK's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLVP vs. GREK - Dividend Comparison
SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than GREK's 3.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF | 3.00% | 3.46% | 4.63% | 2.61% | 2.82% | 2.16% | 2.62% | 2.25% | 2.41% | 2.13% | 1.95% | 1.52% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 1.88% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLVP and GREK have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLVP has higher volatility (19.61%) compared to GREK (8.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVP dropped -80.47% vs GREK's -79.50%.
On 10-year performance, GREK leads with 16.01% vs 12.67% for SLVP. On fees, SLVP is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, GREK has been the lower-risk option at 8.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GREK has performed better with a 16.01% return vs 12.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLVP is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for GREK.
GREK has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 1.88% for SLVP.
SLVP is categorized as Silver, while GREK is Emerging Markets Equities. SLVP tracks MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index, while GREK tracks MSCI All Greece Select 25-50. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SLVP and 0.58% for GREK.
GREK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLVP and GREK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer