SLVP vs. ESPR
SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) is Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index, while ESPR (Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SLVP returned 12.67%/yr vs -14.95%/yr for ESPR. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SLVP vs. ESPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVP achieves a -5.37% return, which is significantly higher than ESPR's -14.86% return. Over the past 10 years, SLVP has outperformed ESPR with an annualized return of 12.67%, while ESPR has yielded a comparatively lower -14.95% annualized return.
SLVP
- 1D
- 3.38%
- 1M
- -21.72%
- YTD
- -5.37%
- 6M
- -0.60%
- 1Y
- 83.53%
- 3Y*
- 48.97%
- 5Y*
- 14.15%
- 10Y*
- 12.67%
ESPR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- -14.86%
- 6M
- -18.18%
- 1Y
- 162.50%
- 3Y*
- 35.36%
- 5Y*
- -34.62%
- 10Y*
- -14.95%
SLVP vs. ESPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | -5.37% | 202.84% | 14.47% | -2.31% | -18.06% | -23.53% | 56.45% | 37.71% | -22.10% | 4.53% |
ESPR Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. | -14.86% | 68.18% | -26.42% | -52.01% | 24.60% | -80.77% | -56.40% | 29.63% | -30.13% | 425.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVP and ESPR is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2013 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVP vs. ESPR — Risk / Return Rank
SLVP
ESPR
SLVP vs. ESPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) and Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. (ESPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLVP | ESPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.36 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 3.07 | -0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.86 | 7.68 | -1.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLVP vs. ESPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVP drawdown since its inception was -80.47%, smaller than the maximum ESPR drawdown of -99.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVP and ESPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVP | ESPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.47% | -99.37% | +18.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.06% | -53.19% | +15.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.06% | -80.94% | +42.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.26% | -97.16% | +42.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.03% | -99.10% | +37.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.74% | -97.27% | +65.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.78% | -69.99% | +23.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.31% | 21.30% | -6.99% |
Volatility
SLVP vs. ESPR - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) has a higher volatility of 19.61% compared to Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. (ESPR) at 1.06%. This indicates that SLVP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVP | ESPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.61% | 1.06% | +18.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.17% | 61.44% | -16.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.53% | 92.66% | -38.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.15% | 91.79% | -48.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.45% | 84.61% | -42.16% |
Dividends
SLVP vs. ESPR - Dividend Comparison
SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, while ESPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPR Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 1.88% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLVP and ESPR have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLVP has higher volatility (19.61%) compared to ESPR (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVP dropped -80.47% vs ESPR's -99.37%.
ESPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLVP and ESPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer