SLVO vs. MLPR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SLVO (UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN) and MLPR (ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - SLVO is a Silver fund tracking the Credit Suisse NASDAQ Silver FLOWS 106 Index, while MLPR is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Alerian MLP Index (150%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SLVO returned 62.53% vs 32.42% for MLPR. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLVO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for MLPR.

Performance

SLVO vs. MLPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLVO achieves a 13.49% return, which is significantly lower than MLPR's 29.81% return.

SLVO

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: 4.05%
• YTD: 13.49%
• 6M: 17.86%
• 1Y: 62.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MLPR

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -1.12%
• YTD: 29.81%
• 6M: 26.95%
• 1Y: 32.42%
• 3Y*: 32.14%
• 5Y*: 26.89%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLVO vs. MLPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SLVO UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN	13.49%	71.20%	1.24%
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN	29.81%	9.83%	14.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SLVO and MLPR is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2024	0.07

The correlation between SLVO and MLPR shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SLVO vs. MLPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLVO

SLVO Risk / Return Rank: 66
SLVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
SLVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
SLVO Omega Ratio Rank: 72
SLVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
SLVO Martin Ratio Rank: 77

MLPR

MLPR Risk / Return Rank: 44
MLPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
MLPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
MLPR Omega Ratio Rank: 42
MLPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
MLPR Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLVO vs. MLPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SLVO	MLPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	1.59	+0.54
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	2.11	+0.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.27	+0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.65	2.33	+1.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.01	7.53	+7.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SLVO vs. MLPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLVO Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the MLPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLVO and MLPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SLVO	MLPR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13	1.59	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.61	0.93	+0.67

Drawdowns

SLVO vs. MLPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLVO drawdown since its inception was -17.23%, smaller than the maximum MLPR drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVO and MLPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLVO	MLPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.23%	-48.98%	+31.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.23%	-13.97%	-3.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.45%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.22%	-7.07%	+3.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.13%	-8.94%	+5.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.18%	4.32%	-0.14%

Volatility

SLVO vs. MLPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO) is 6.39%, while ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) has a volatility of 8.12%. This indicates that SLVO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLVO	MLPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.39%	8.12%	-1.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.33%	14.85%	+12.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.53%	20.64%	+8.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.23%	29.52%	-4.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.23%	33.75%	-8.52%

SLVO vs. MLPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLVO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPR's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLVO vs. MLPR - Dividend Comparison

SLVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.44%, more than MLPR's 9.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN	9.00%	10.85%	9.57%	10.08%	7.49%	10.69%	4.21%
SLVO UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN	46.44%	19.35%	14.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLVO and MLPR in my portfolio?

SLVO and MLPR have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SLVO or MLPR?

MLPR has higher volatility (8.12%) compared to SLVO (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVO dropped -17.23% vs MLPR's -48.98%.

Which ETF is better, SLVO or MLPR?

On 1-year performance, SLVO leads with 62.53% vs 32.42% for MLPR. On fees, SLVO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, SLVO has been the lower-risk option at 6.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SLVO or MLPR?

Over the 1-year period, SLVO has performed better with a 62.53% return vs 32.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SLVO or MLPR?

SLVO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MLPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SLVO or MLPR?

SLVO has the higher dividend yield at 46.44%, compared with 9.00% for MLPR.

What is the main difference between SLVO and MLPR?

SLVO is categorized as Silver, while MLPR is Leveraged Equities. SLVO tracks Credit Suisse NASDAQ Silver FLOWS 106 Index, while MLPR tracks Alerian MLP Index (150%). Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SLVO and 0.95% for MLPR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SLVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.