PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLVIX vs. SLMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLVIX vs. SLMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class 2 (SLVIX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLVIX achieves a 13.57% return, which is significantly lower than SLMCX's 58.65% return. Over the past 10 years, SLVIX has underperformed SLMCX with an annualized return of 13.43%, while SLMCX has yielded a comparatively higher 28.01% annualized return.


SLVIX

1D
0.74%
1M
5.27%
YTD
13.57%
6M
17.08%
1Y
37.33%
3Y*
21.12%
5Y*
11.81%
10Y*
13.43%

SLMCX

1D
3.67%
1M
15.56%
YTD
58.65%
6M
55.34%
1Y
126.30%
3Y*
47.62%
5Y*
26.81%
10Y*
28.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLVIX vs. SLMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLVIX
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class 2
13.57%28.02%12.90%5.90%-0.78%26.68%6.49%26.89%-12.03%19.05%
SLMCX
Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund
58.65%37.32%26.67%44.27%-31.14%38.97%44.45%54.15%-8.12%34.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SLVIX and SLMCX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2002

0.75

The correlation between SLVIX and SLMCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (3 years) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLVIX vs. SLMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLVIX
SLVIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SLVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SLMCX
SLMCX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SLMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SLMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLVIX vs. SLMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class 2 (SLVIX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLVIXSLMCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.71

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.26

10.65

-6.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.52

41.17

-23.65

SLVIX vs. SLMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLVIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.26, which is lower than the SLMCX Sharpe Ratio of 5.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLVIX and SLMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLVIXSLMCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.26

5.03

-1.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

1.03

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

1.08

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.73

-0.28

Drawdowns

SLVIX vs. SLMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLVIX drawdown since its inception was -59.63%, smaller than the maximum SLMCX drawdown of -68.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVIX and SLMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLVIXSLMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.63%

-68.10%

+8.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.00%

-12.33%

+3.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.71%

-29.13%

+14.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.35%

-37.32%

+18.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.46%

-37.32%

-4.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.29%

-13.00%

+4.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

3.18%

-1.00%

Volatility

SLVIX vs. SLMCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class 2 (SLVIX) is 3.25%, while Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) has a volatility of 7.25%. This indicates that SLVIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLVIXSLMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

7.25%

-4.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.83%

20.07%

-11.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.76%

26.09%

-14.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.90%

26.21%

-10.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.68%

26.14%

-7.46%

SLVIX vs. SLMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLVIX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than SLMCX's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLVIX vs. SLMCX - Dividend Comparison

SLVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, more than SLMCX's 5.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLMCX
Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund
5.96%9.45%14.27%5.16%9.42%11.75%10.40%11.44%12.33%11.15%8.19%10.79%
SLVIX
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class 2
7.37%8.37%3.62%3.75%1.62%5.95%7.47%6.97%5.02%3.73%6.95%4.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLVIX and SLMCX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLMCX has higher volatility (7.25%) compared to SLVIX (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVIX dropped -59.63% vs SLMCX's -68.10%.

SLMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.03 vs 3.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLVIX and SLMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer