SLVIX vs. DDVCX
SLVIX (Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class 2) and DDVCX (Nomura Value Fund Class C) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLVIX returned 13.50%/yr vs 6.81%/yr for DDVCX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SLVIX charges 0.53%/yr vs 1.72%/yr for DDVCX.
Performance
SLVIX vs. DDVCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVIX achieves a 13.57% return, which is significantly higher than DDVCX's 6.18% return. Over the past 10 years, SLVIX has outperformed DDVCX with an annualized return of 13.50%, while DDVCX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.81% annualized return.
SLVIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.20%
- YTD
- 13.57%
- 6M
- 13.19%
- 1Y
- 37.40%
- 3Y*
- 19.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.50%
DDVCX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 6.18%
- 6M
- 5.73%
- 1Y
- 17.60%
- 3Y*
- 8.43%
- 5Y*
- 5.58%
- 10Y*
- 6.81%
SLVIX vs. DDVCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVIX Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class 2 | 13.57% | 28.02% | 12.90% | 5.90% | -0.78% | 26.68% | 6.49% | 26.89% | -12.03% | 19.05% |
DDVCX Nomura Value Fund Class C | 6.18% | 9.95% | 5.68% | 1.06% | -4.57% | 20.87% | -0.63% | 19.33% | -3.92% | 12.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVIX and DDVCX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2002 | 0.91 |
The correlation between SLVIX and DDVCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVIX vs. DDVCX — Risk / Return Rank
SLVIX
DDVCX
SLVIX vs. DDVCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class 2 (SLVIX) and Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLVIX | DDVCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.26 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.16 | 2.07 | +2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.04 | 5.83 | +11.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLVIX vs. DDVCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVIX drawdown since its inception was -59.63%, which is greater than DDVCX's maximum drawdown of -54.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVIX and DDVCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVIX | DDVCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.63% | -54.29% | -5.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.00% | -8.59% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.71% | -18.71% | +4.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.35% | -18.71% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.46% | -37.60% | -3.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -3.70% | +2.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.28% | -9.03% | +0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 3.03% | -0.84% |
Volatility
SLVIX vs. DDVCX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class 2 (SLVIX) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX) at 3.61%. This indicates that SLVIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DDVCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVIX | DDVCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 3.61% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.32% | 9.25% | +0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.19% | 12.15% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.93% | 14.58% | +1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 17.09% | +1.61% |
SLVIX vs. DDVCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVIX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than DDVCX's 1.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLVIX vs. DDVCX - Dividend Comparison
SLVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, less than DDVCX's 24.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDVCX Nomura Value Fund Class C | 24.81% | 26.55% | 30.88% | 10.78% | 9.46% | 23.96% | 1.92% | 4.13% | 5.29% | 3.08% | 1.57% | 1.97% |
SLVIX Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class 2 | 7.37% | 8.37% | 3.62% | 3.75% | 1.62% | 5.95% | 7.47% | 6.97% | 5.02% | 3.73% | 6.95% | 4.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLVIX and DDVCX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLVIX has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to DDVCX (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVIX dropped -59.63% vs DDVCX's -54.29%.
SLVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLVIX and DDVCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer