PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SLV vs. RYCEY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SLV vs. RYCEY

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SLV (iShares Silver Trust) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while RYCEY (Rolls-Royce Holdings plc) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SLV returned 13.99%/yr vs 8.49%/yr for RYCEY. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SLV vs. RYCEY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLV achieves a -4.86% return, which is significantly lower than RYCEY's 12.43% return. Over the past 10 years, SLV has outperformed RYCEY with an annualized return of 13.99%, while RYCEY has yielded a comparatively lower 8.49% annualized return.

SLV

1D
0.77%
1M
-22.76%
YTD
-4.86%
6M
9.25%
1Y
85.39%
3Y*
41.27%
5Y*
18.83%
10Y*
13.99%

RYCEY

1D
1.79%
1M
7.56%
YTD
12.43%
6M
19.66%
1Y
46.06%
3Y*
113.04%
5Y*
61.46%
10Y*
8.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLV vs. RYCEY - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLV
iShares Silver Trust		-4.86%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc		12.43%123.64%88.21%253.27%-33.95%2.53%-82.05%-12.69%-7.35%40.70%

Correlation

The correlation between SLV and RYCEY is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2014

0.14

The correlation between SLV and RYCEY shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Silver Trust

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc

Often compared with SLV:
SLV vs. GLDSLV vs. SIVRSLV vs. PSLVSLV vs. SILSLV vs. SILJSLV vs. SLVPSLV vs. AGQ
Often compared with RYCEY:
RYCEY vs. RR.LRYCEY vs. SMRRYCEY vs. RHM.DERYCEY vs. SPYRYCEY vs. BAESYRYCEY vs. VOORYCEY vs. AAPL

Return for Risk

SLV vs. RYCEY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
RYCEY
RYCEY Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
RYCEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCEY Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCEY Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLV vs. RYCEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

SLVRYCEYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.44
1.22

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.76
1.90

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.23

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

2.13

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.10

5.98

-1.87

SLV vs. RYCEY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the RYCEY Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLV and RYCEY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLV vs. RYCEY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLV drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, smaller than the maximum RYCEY drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLV and RYCEY.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SLVRYCEYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.28%

-99.07%

+22.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.40%

-21.75%

-23.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.40%

-23.37%

-22.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.40%

-62.01%

+16.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.40%

-94.64%

+49.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.96%

-77.68%

+35.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.66%

-84.15%

+39.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.88%

7.73%

+13.15%

Volatility

SLV vs. RYCEY - Volatility Comparison

iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a higher volatility of 16.34% compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) at 12.00%. This indicates that SLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYCEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SLVRYCEYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.34%

12.00%

+4.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.10%

32.70%

+26.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.82%

37.88%

+21.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.46%

43.48%

-7.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.00%

49.35%

-17.35%

Dividends

SLV vs. RYCEY - Dividend Comparison

SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RYCEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc		0.72%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.51%1.56%1.32%1.55%4.19%14.44%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

SLV and RYCEY have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.34%) compared to RYCEY (12.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLV dropped -76.28% vs RYCEY's -99.07%.

SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLV and RYCEY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer