SLV vs. RBIL
SLV (iShares Silver Trust) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SLV returned 63.23% vs 3.81% for RBIL. Their -0.09 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SLV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
SLV vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLV achieves a -12.96% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.61% return.
SLV
- 1D
- 4.14%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- 6M
- -29.19%
- YTD
- -12.96%
- 1Y
- 63.23%
- 3Y*
- 37.31%
- 5Y*
- 20.01%
- 10Y*
- 11.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.52%
RBIL
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 2.25%
- YTD
- 2.61%
- 1Y
- 3.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.19M | $1.87M | $2.26M | |
| $767.61M | $778.40M | $1.22B |
SLV vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -12.96% | 118.82% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.61% | 2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLV and RBIL is -0.12, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLV vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
SLV
RBIL
SLV vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLV | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 2.00 | -0.77 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 6.80 | -5.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.28 | 27.52 | -25.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLV vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLV drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLV and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLV | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.28% | -0.56% | -75.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.28% | -0.56% | -51.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.90% | -0.22% | -46.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.69% | -0.08% | -44.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.82% | 0.14% | +27.68% |
Volatility
SLV vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a higher volatility of 11.38% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.28%. This indicates that SLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLV | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.38% | 0.28% | +11.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.01% | 0.89% | +43.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.50% | 0.96% | +60.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.04% | 1.06% | +35.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.24% | 1.06% | +31.18% |
SLV vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLV vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.16% | 3.65% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLV and RBIL have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (11.38%) compared to RBIL (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLV dropped -76.28% vs RBIL's -0.56%.
On 1-year performance, SLV leads with 63.23% vs 3.81% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SLV has performed better with a 63.23% return vs 3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
SLV is categorized as Silver, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SLV and 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.98 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLV and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer