SLV vs. BTCI
SLV (iShares Silver Trust) and BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while BTCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos. SLV is passively managed, while BTCI is actively managed. Over the past year, SLV returned 81.88% vs -34.62% for BTCI. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BTCI.
Performance
SLV vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLV achieves a -7.62% return, which is significantly higher than BTCI's -25.54% return.
SLV
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- -12.95%
- YTD
- -7.62%
- 6M
- -2.33%
- 1Y
- 81.88%
- 3Y*
- 38.96%
- 5Y*
- 20.04%
- 10Y*
- 13.58%
BTCI
- 1D
- -2.32%
- 1M
- -16.42%
- YTD
- -25.54%
- 6M
- -25.93%
- 1Y
- -34.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLV vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -7.62% | 144.66% | -8.92% |
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | -25.54% | -1.09% | 26.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLV and BTCI is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLV vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank
SLV
BTCI
SLV vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLV | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.86 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | -0.74 | +2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.68 | -1.31 | +4.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLV vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLV drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, which is greater than BTCI's maximum drawdown of -47.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLV and BTCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLV | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.28% | -47.16% | -29.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.40% | -47.16% | +1.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.65% | -44.94% | +1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.65% | -15.92% | -28.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.52% | 26.71% | -5.19% |
Volatility
SLV vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison
iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a higher volatility of 14.09% compared to NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) at 12.11%. This indicates that SLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLV | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.09% | 12.11% | +1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.18% | 31.18% | +28.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.10% | 39.53% | +20.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.50% | 40.31% | -3.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.04% | 40.31% | -8.27% |
SLV vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCI's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLV vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison
SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | 48.02% | 36.46% | 6.76% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLV and BTCI have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (14.09%) compared to BTCI (12.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLV dropped -76.28% vs BTCI's -47.16%.
On 1-year performance, SLV leads with 81.88% vs -34.62% for BTCI. On fees, SLV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, BTCI has been the lower-risk option at 12.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SLV has performed better with a 81.88% return vs -34.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.
BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 48.02%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
SLV is categorized as Silver, while BTCI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SLV and 0.99% for BTCI.
SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLV and BTCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer