SLTY vs. FYC
SLTY (YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF) and FYC (First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SLTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while FYC is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Growth Index. SLTY is actively managed, while FYC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.66, they often move in opposite directions. SLTY charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for FYC.
Performance
SLTY vs. FYC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLTY achieves a -6.01% return, which is significantly lower than FYC's 20.01% return.
SLTY
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- -6.01%
- 6M
- -5.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FYC
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- 20.01%
- 6M
- 20.96%
- 1Y
- 53.40%
- 3Y*
- 26.12%
- 5Y*
- 10.47%
- 10Y*
- 14.30%
SLTY vs. FYC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLTY YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF | -6.01% | -12.17% |
FYC First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | 20.01% | 15.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLTY and FYC is -0.66, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | -0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLTY vs. FYC — Risk / Return Rank
SLTY
FYC
SLTY vs. FYC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF (SLTY) and First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLTY | FYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.19 | 0.54 | -1.73 |
Drawdowns
SLTY vs. FYC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLTY drawdown since its inception was -20.88%, smaller than the maximum FYC drawdown of -47.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLTY and FYC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLTY | FYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.88% | -47.85% | +26.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.45% | -1.83% | -15.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.72% | -9.66% | -4.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.87% | — |
Volatility
SLTY vs. FYC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLTY | FYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.42% | 21.03% | -2.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 23.62% | -5.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 24.57% | -6.15% |
SLTY vs. FYC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLTY has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than FYC's 0.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLTY vs. FYC - Dividend Comparison
SLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 74.24%, more than FYC's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYC First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | 0.07% | 0.08% | 0.72% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.63% | 0.12% | 0.39% | 0.09% | 0.10% | 0.31% | 0.21% |
SLTY YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF | 74.24% | 29.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLTY and FYC have a correlation of -0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FYC is cheaper at 0.71% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FYC is cheaper with a 0.71% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for SLTY.
SLTY has the higher dividend yield at 74.24%, compared with 0.07% for FYC.
SLTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while FYC is Small Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for SLTY and 0.71% for FYC.
Find the right allocation for SLTY and FYC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer