PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLTY vs. COSW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLTY vs. COSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF (SLTY) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLTY achieves a -6.01% return, which is significantly lower than COSW's 12.13% return.


SLTY

1D
0.65%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
-6.01%
6M
-5.54%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COSW

1D
0.92%
1M
-6.40%
YTD
12.13%
6M
2.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLTY vs. COSW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SLTY and COSW is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLTY vs. COSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF (SLTY) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SLTY vs. COSW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLTYCOSWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.19

0.01

-1.20

Drawdowns

SLTY vs. COSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLTY drawdown since its inception was -20.88%, which is greater than COSW's maximum drawdown of -16.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLTY and COSW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLTYCOSWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.88%

-16.24%

-4.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.45%

-14.62%

-2.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.72%

-4.17%

-9.55%

Volatility

SLTY vs. COSW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLTYCOSWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.42%

26.10%

-7.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.42%

26.10%

-7.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.42%

26.10%

-7.68%

SLTY vs. COSW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLTY has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than COSW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLTY vs. COSW - Dividend Comparison

SLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 74.24%, more than COSW's 18.13% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SLTY and COSW have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COSW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COSW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for SLTY.

SLTY has the higher dividend yield at 74.24%, compared with 18.13% for COSW.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for SLTY and 0.99% for COSW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLTY and COSW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer